Propose a change

Capital Allowances Act 2001

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

262AE Co-ownership schemes: effect of election for purchasers

(1) This section has effect where— (a) an election under section 262AB is made by the operator of a co-ownership ... contractual scheme, (b) property consisting of a fixture ceased to be subject to the scheme at any time in an accounting period for which the election has effect, (c) in a calculation made by the operator of the scheme under section 262AC(2) the assumption in section 262AC(3)(g) was made in relation to that fixture, and (d) a person (“the current owner”) is treated as the owner of the fixture as a result of incurring capital expenditure on its provision (“the new expenditure”). (2) In determining the current owner's qualifying expenditure— (a) if the disposal value statement requirement is not satisfied, the new expenditure is to be treated as nil, and (b) in any other case, any amount of the new expenditure which exceeds the assumed disposal value is to be left out of account (or, if such an amount has already been taken into account, is to be treated as an amount that should never have been taken into account). (3) The disposal value statement requirement is that— (a) the operator of the scheme has, no later than 2 years after the date when the fixture ceased to be property subject to the scheme, made a written statement of the assumed disposal value, and (b) the current owner has obtained that statement or a copy of it (directly or indirectly) from the operator of the scheme. (4) Sections 185 (fixture on which a plant and machinery allowance has been claimed) and 187A (effect of changes in ownership of fixture) do not apply in relation to the new expenditure. (5) In this section “assumed disposal value” means the disposal value that, in making the calculation referred to in subsection (1)(c), was assumed to be brought into account pursuant to section 262AC(3)(h).

Your change, as a redline

262AE Co-ownership schemes: effect of election for purchasers

(1) This section has effect where— (a) an election under section 262AB is made by the operator of a co-ownership ... contractual scheme, (b) property consisting of a fixture ceased to be subject to the scheme at any time in an accounting period for which the election has effect, (c) in a calculation made by the operator of the scheme under section 262AC(2) the assumption in section 262AC(3)(g) was made in relation to that fixture, and (d) a person (“the current owner”) is treated as the owner of the fixture as a result of incurring capital expenditure on its provision (“the new expenditure”). (2) In determining the current owner's qualifying expenditure— (a) if the disposal value statement requirement is not satisfied, the new expenditure is to be treated as nil, and (b) in any other case, any amount of the new expenditure which exceeds the assumed disposal value is to be left out of account (or, if such an amount has already been taken into account, is to be treated as an amount that should never have been taken into account). (3) The disposal value statement requirement is that— (a) the operator of the scheme has, no later than 2 years after the date when the fixture ceased to be property subject to the scheme, made a written statement of the assumed disposal value, and (b) the current owner has obtained that statement or a copy of it (directly or indirectly) from the operator of the scheme. (4) Sections 185 (fixture on which a plant and machinery allowance has been claimed) and 187A (effect of changes in ownership of fixture) do not apply in relation to the new expenditure. (5) In this section “assumed disposal value” means the disposal value that, in making the calculation referred to in subsection (1)(c), was assumed to be brought into account pursuant to section 262AC(3)(h).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds