Propose a change

Capital Allowances Act 2001

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

270IA Evidence of qualifying expenditure etc

(1) This section applies if a person (the “current owner”) is entitled to an allowance for a chargeable period under section 270AA by reference to a building or structure. (2) For the purposes of determining the amount of the allowance, the amount of the qualifying expenditure is treated as nil unless, before the current owner first makes a claim for an allowance under this Part, the allowance statement requirement is met. (3) The “allowance statement requirement” is met if— (a) in a case where the current owner incurred the qualifying expenditure in relation to the building or structure, the current owner makes an allowance statement; (b) in any other case, the current owner obtains (directly or indirectly) an allowance statement (or a copy of it) from any person who has previously been entitled to a relevant interest in the building or structure. (4) In this section an “allowance statement” means a written statement, identifying the building or structure to which it relates, of— (a) the date of the earliest ... contract for the construction of the building or structure, (b) the amount of qualifying expenditure incurred on its construction or acquisition, (c) the date on which the building or structure is first brought into non-residential use , and (d) where qualifying expenditure is incurred on the construction or acquisition of the building or structure after the date mentioned in paragraph (c), the date on which the expenditure is incurred. (5) Where the qualifying expenditure described in subsection (4)(b) consists of or includes special tax site qualifying expenditure (as defined in section 270BNA), a statement is not an allowance statement unless it states the amount of the special tax site qualifying expenditure.

Your change, as a redline

270IA Evidence of qualifying expenditure etc

(1) This section applies if a person (the “current owner”) is entitled to an allowance for a chargeable period under section 270AA by reference to a building or structure. (2) For the purposes of determining the amount of the allowance, the amount of the qualifying expenditure is treated as nil unless, before the current owner first makes a claim for an allowance under this Part, the allowance statement requirement is met. (3) The “allowance statement requirement” is met if— (a) in a case where the current owner incurred the qualifying expenditure in relation to the building or structure, the current owner makes an allowance statement; (b) in any other case, the current owner obtains (directly or indirectly) an allowance statement (or a copy of it) from any person who has previously been entitled to a relevant interest in the building or structure. (4) In this section an “allowance statement” means a written statement, identifying the building or structure to which it relates, of— (a) the date of the earliest ... contract for the construction of the building or structure, (b) the amount of qualifying expenditure incurred on its construction or acquisition, (c) the date on which the building or structure is first brought into non-residential use , and (d) where qualifying expenditure is incurred on the construction or acquisition of the building or structure after the date mentioned in paragraph (c), the date on which the expenditure is incurred. (5) Where the qualifying expenditure described in subsection (4)(b) consists of or includes special tax site qualifying expenditure (as defined in section 270BNA), a statement is not an allowance statement unless it states the amount of the special tax site qualifying expenditure.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds