Propose a change

Capital Allowances Act 2001

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

339 Crown or other person not within the charge to tax entitled to the relevant interest

(1) This section applies if at any time— (a) the Crown, or (b) a person who is not within the charge to tax, (“A”) is entitled to the relevant interest in a building. (2) Sections 333 to 338 (writing off qualifying expenditure) have effect as if all writing-down allowances and balancing adjustments had been made as could have been made if— (a) a person (“B”) who— (i) is not the Crown, (ii) is within the charge to tax, and (iii) is not a company, had been entitled to the relevant interest, and (b) the other assumptions in subsection (3) had been made. (3) The assumptions are that— (a) while A was entitled to the relevant interest, all things which were done in relation to the building— (i) by or to A, or (ii) by or to a person using the building under the authority of A, were done by or to B for the purposes of, and in the course of, a trade carried on by B, (b) any sale of the relevant interest in the building by or on behalf of A was made in connection with the termination of the trade carried on by B, and (c) B’s periods of account for that trade had, in the case of each tax year, ended immediately before the beginning of the next tax year.

Your change, as a redline

339 Crown or other person not within the charge to tax entitled to the relevant interest

(1) This section applies if at any time— (a) the Crown, or (b) a person who is not within the charge to tax, (“A”) is entitled to the relevant interest in a building. (2) Sections 333 to 338 (writing off qualifying expenditure) have effect as if all writing-down allowances and balancing adjustments had been made as could have been made if— (a) a person (“B”) who— (i) is not the Crown, (ii) is within the charge to tax, and (iii) is not a company, had been entitled to the relevant interest, and (b) the other assumptions in subsection (3) had been made. (3) The assumptions are that— (a) while A was entitled to the relevant interest, all things which were done in relation to the building— (i) by or to A, or (ii) by or to a person using the building under the authority of A, were done by or to B for the purposes of, and in the course of, a trade carried on by B, (b) any sale of the relevant interest in the building by or on behalf of A was made in connection with the termination of the trade carried on by B, and (c) B’s periods of account for that trade had, in the case of each tax year, ended immediately before the beginning of the next tax year.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds