Propose a change

Capital Allowances Act 2001

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

369 Capital expenditure on construction of agricultural building

(1) If— (a) capital expenditure has been incurred on the construction of an agricultural building, (b) the expenditure was incurred for the purposes of husbandry as mentioned in section 361, and (c) the relevant interest has not been sold or, if it has been sold, has been sold only after the first use of the building, the capital expenditure is qualifying expenditure. (2) Subsections (3) and (4) apply if the capital expenditure has been incurred on the construction of a farmhouse. (3) If the accommodation and amenities of the farmhouse are proportionate to the nature and extent of the farm, only one third of the capital expenditure is to be taken into account under subsection (1). (4) If they are disproportionate, only such part of the expenditure as is just and reasonable (and not exceeding one third) is to be taken into account under subsection (1). (5) If— (a) the capital expenditure is incurred on the construction of any agricultural building other than a farmhouse, and (b) the building is to be used partly for the purposes of husbandry on the related agricultural land and partly for other purposes, only such part of the expenditure as, on a just and reasonable apportionment, is referable to use for the purposes of husbandry is to be taken into account under subsection (1).

Your change, as a redline

369 Capital expenditure on construction of agricultural building

(1) If— (a) capital expenditure has been incurred on the construction of an agricultural building, (b) the expenditure was incurred for the purposes of husbandry as mentioned in section 361, and (c) the relevant interest has not been sold or, if it has been sold, has been sold only after the first use of the building, the capital expenditure is qualifying expenditure. (2) Subsections (3) and (4) apply if the capital expenditure has been incurred on the construction of a farmhouse. (3) If the accommodation and amenities of the farmhouse are proportionate to the nature and extent of the farm, only one third of the capital expenditure is to be taken into account under subsection (1). (4) If they are disproportionate, only such part of the expenditure as is just and reasonable (and not exceeding one third) is to be taken into account under subsection (1). (5) If— (a) the capital expenditure is incurred on the construction of any agricultural building other than a farmhouse, and (b) the building is to be used partly for the purposes of husbandry on the related agricultural land and partly for other purposes, only such part of the expenditure as, on a just and reasonable apportionment, is referable to use for the purposes of husbandry is to be taken into account under subsection (1).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds