Propose a change

Capital Allowances Act 2001

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

422 Use of asset otherwise than for permitted development etc.

(1) This section applies if— (a) a person has acquired a mineral asset, (b) at any time after the acquisition, the asset begins to be used (by him or another person) in a way which constitutes development, and (c) the development is not— (i) existing permitted development, or (ii) development for the purposes of a mineral extraction trade carried on by the person. (2) The person is required to bring the disposal value of the mineral asset into account for the chargeable period in which the use begins. (3) Development is existing permitted development if at the time of the acquisition— (a) it has been, or had begun to be, lawfully carried out, or (b) it could be lawfully carried out under planning permission granted by a general development order. (4) In applying subsection (3) in relation to land outside the United Kingdom— (a) whether, at the time of the acquisition, development has been, or had begun to be, lawfully carried out is to be determined according to the law of the territory in which the land is situated, and (b) whether, at that time, development could be lawfully carried out under planning permission granted by a general development order is to be determined as if the land were in England.

Your change, as a redline

422 Use of asset otherwise than for permitted development etc.

(1) This section applies if— (a) a person has acquired a mineral asset, (b) at any time after the acquisition, the asset begins to be used (by him or another person) in a way which constitutes development, and (c) the development is not— (i) existing permitted development, or (ii) development for the purposes of a mineral extraction trade carried on by the person. (2) The person is required to bring the disposal value of the mineral asset into account for the chargeable period in which the use begins. (3) Development is existing permitted development if at the time of the acquisition— (a) it has been, or had begun to be, lawfully carried out, or (b) it could be lawfully carried out under planning permission granted by a general development order. (4) In applying subsection (3) in relation to land outside the United Kingdom— (a) whether, at the time of the acquisition, development has been, or had begun to be, lawfully carried out is to be determined according to the law of the territory in which the land is situated, and (b) whether, at that time, development could be lawfully carried out under planning permission granted by a general development order is to be determined as if the land were in England.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds