Propose a change

Capital Allowances Act 2001

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

445 Costs of demolition

(1) This section applies if— (a) an asset representing qualifying expenditure incurred by a person is demolished at a time when the person owns the asset, and (b) the person incurred costs of demolition. (2) The disposal value which the person is required to bring into account in respect of the qualifying expenditure is to be reduced by the cost to the person of the demolition. (3) If the amount of the disposal value is reduced to nil (or less than nil) under subsection (2), the person is not required to bring a disposal value into account. (4) If— (a) the cost to the person of the demolition exceeds the disposal value, and (b) before its demolition the asset had not begun to be used for purposes other than research and development related to the relevant trade, the person is to be treated as incurring qualifying expenditure equal to the excess. (5) That qualifying expenditure is to be treated as incurred— (a) when the demolition occurs, or (b) if that is on or after the date on which the relevant trade is permanently discontinued, immediately before the discontinuance. (6) If this section applies, the cost to the person of the demolition is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as expenditure on any property that replaces the demolished asset.

Your change, as a redline

445 Costs of demolition

(1) This section applies if— (a) an asset representing qualifying expenditure incurred by a person is demolished at a time when the person owns the asset, and (b) the person incurred costs of demolition. (2) The disposal value which the person is required to bring into account in respect of the qualifying expenditure is to be reduced by the cost to the person of the demolition. (3) If the amount of the disposal value is reduced to nil (or less than nil) under subsection (2), the person is not required to bring a disposal value into account. (4) If— (a) the cost to the person of the demolition exceeds the disposal value, and (b) before its demolition the asset had not begun to be used for purposes other than research and development related to the relevant trade, the person is to be treated as incurring qualifying expenditure equal to the excess. (5) That qualifying expenditure is to be treated as incurred— (a) when the demolition occurs, or (b) if that is on or after the date on which the relevant trade is permanently discontinued, immediately before the discontinuance. (6) If this section applies, the cost to the person of the demolition is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as expenditure on any property that replaces the demolished asset.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds