Propose a change

Capital Allowances Act 2001

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

536 Contributions not made by public bodies and not eligible for tax relief

(1) A person (“R”) is to be regarded as having incurred expenditure (despite section 532(1)) to the extent that the requirements in subsections (2) and (3) are satisfied in relation to the expenditure (but see subsection (6)). (2) The first requirement is that the person meeting R’s expenditure (“C”) is not a public body. (3) The second requirement is that— (a) no allowance can be made under Chapter 2 in respect of C’s expenditure, and (b) the expenditure is not allowed to be deducted in calculating the profits of a trade or relevant activity carried on by C. (4) When determining for the purposes of subsection (3)(a) whether an allowance can be made under Chapter 2, assume that C is within the charge to tax. (5) In subsection (3)(b) “relevant activity” means— (a) for the purposes of Part 2— (i) a UK property business; (ii) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (iii) an ... overseas property business; (iiia) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (iv) a profession or vocation; (v) any concern listed in section 12(4) of ITTOIA 2005 or section 39(5) of CTA 2009 (mines, transport undertakings etc.); (vi) the management of an investment company; (b) for other purposes, a profession or vocation. (6) Subsection (1) does not apply for the purposes of Part 2A (structures and buildings allowances).

Your change, as a redline

536 Contributions not made by public bodies and not eligible for tax relief

(1) A person (“R”) is to be regarded as having incurred expenditure (despite section 532(1)) to the extent that the requirements in subsections (2) and (3) are satisfied in relation to the expenditure (but see subsection (6)). (2) The first requirement is that the person meeting R’s expenditure (“C”) is not a public body. (3) The second requirement is that— (a) no allowance can be made under Chapter 2 in respect of C’s expenditure, and (b) the expenditure is not allowed to be deducted in calculating the profits of a trade or relevant activity carried on by C. (4) When determining for the purposes of subsection (3)(a) whether an allowance can be made under Chapter 2, assume that C is within the charge to tax. (5) In subsection (3)(b) “relevant activity” means— (a) for the purposes of Part 2— (i) a UK property business; (ii) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (iii) an ... overseas property business; (iiia) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (iv) a profession or vocation; (v) any concern listed in section 12(4) of ITTOIA 2005 or section 39(5) of CTA 2009 (mines, transport undertakings etc.); (vi) the management of an investment company; (b) for other purposes, a profession or vocation. (6) Subsection (1) does not apply for the purposes of Part 2A (structures and buildings allowances).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds