Propose a change

Capital Allowances Act 2001

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

570A Avoidance affecting proceeds of balancing event

(1) This section applies where an event occurs in relation to an asset (a “ balancing event ”) as a result of which a balancing allowance would (but for this section) fall to be made to a person (“the taxpayer”) under Part ..., 3A ... ... 5 or 10. (2) The taxpayer is not entitled to any balancing allowance if, as a result of a tax avoidance scheme, the amount to be brought into account as the proceeds from the event is less than it would otherwise have been. (3) In subsection (2) a “ tax avoidance scheme ” means a scheme or arrangement the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of which is the obtaining of a tax advantage by the taxpayer. (4) Where this section applies to deny a balancing allowance, the residue of qualifying expenditure immediately after the balancing event is nevertheless calculated as if the balancing allowance had been made. (5) In this section as it applies for the purposes of Part 5 (mineral extraction allowances)— (a) the references to the proceeds from the balancing event that are to be brought into account shall be read as references to the disposal value to be brought into account, and (b) the reference to the residue of qualifying expenditure shall be read as a reference to the unrelieved qualifying expenditure.

Your change, as a redline

570A Avoidance affecting proceeds of balancing event

(1) This section applies where an event occurs in relation to an asset (a “ balancing event ”) as a result of which a balancing allowance would (but for this section) fall to be made to a person (“the taxpayer”) under Part ..., 3A ... ... 5 or 10. (2) The taxpayer is not entitled to any balancing allowance if, as a result of a tax avoidance scheme, the amount to be brought into account as the proceeds from the event is less than it would otherwise have been. (3) In subsection (2) a “ tax avoidance scheme ” means a scheme or arrangement the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of which is the obtaining of a tax advantage by the taxpayer. (4) Where this section applies to deny a balancing allowance, the residue of qualifying expenditure immediately after the balancing event is nevertheless calculated as if the balancing allowance had been made. (5) In this section as it applies for the purposes of Part 5 (mineral extraction allowances)— (a) the references to the proceeds from the balancing event that are to be brought into account shall be read as references to the disposal value to be brought into account, and (b) the reference to the residue of qualifying expenditure shall be read as a reference to the unrelieved qualifying expenditure.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds