Arbitration (Scotland) Act 1894 (repealed)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
6 Interpretation.
For the purposes of this Act the expression “the court” shall mean any sheriff having jurisdiction or any Lord Ordinary of the Court of Session : except that where— (a) any arbiter appointed is; or (b) in terms of the agreement to refer to arbitration an arbiter or oversman to be appointed must be, a Senator of the College of Justice, “the court” shall mean the Inner House of the Court of Session.
6 Interpretation.
For the purposes of this Act the expression “the court” shall mean any sheriff having jurisdiction or any Lord Ordinary of the Court of Session : except that where— (a) any arbiter appointed is; or (b) in terms of the agreement to refer to arbitration an arbiter or oversman to be appointed must be, a Senator of the College of Justice, “the court” shall mean the Inner House of the Court of Session.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.