Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
21-I:37 Federal Exceptions.
If any department or agency of the state is advised by the federal government that its data processing equipment or its forms, methods or techniques in utilizing said equipment do not comply with any federal rule, regulation or law, then the governor and council may authorize the department or agency to alter its data processing equipment or its forms, methods or techniques to comply with any such rule, regulation or law. Automated data processing facilities and equipment of any department or agency of the state paid for completely by federal funds shall be utilized to the fullest extent permitted by federal rule, regulation or law for the general benefit of the state for applications not in conflict with other provisions of this chapter; and all data in said equipment which by federal rule, regulation or law must not be kept confidential shall be made available by any such department or agency to all state agencies including the department of administrative services to the maximum extent permitted by federal rule, regulation or law in a form approved by the department of administrative services; except that in the case of the department of employment security, such form shall be approved jointly by the department of administrative services and the department of employment security. Any dispute arising between any such department or agency and any other state agency as to the utilization requested by the department of administrative services of said facilities, equipment and data shall be resolved by the governor.
Source. 1985, 399:1, eff. July 1, 1985.
Your change, as a redline
21-I:37 Federal Exceptions.
If any department or agency of the state is advised by the federal government that its data processing equipment or its forms, methods or techniques in utilizing said equipment do not comply with any federal rule, regulation or law, then the governor and council may authorize the department or agency to alter its data processing equipment or its forms, methods or techniques to comply with any such rule, regulation or law. Automated data processing facilities and equipment of any department or agency of the state paid for completely by federal funds shall be utilized to the fullest extent permitted by federal rule, regulation or law for the general benefit of the state for applications not in conflict with other provisions of this chapter; and all data in said equipment which by federal rule, regulation or law must not be kept confidential shall be made available by any such department or agency to all state agencies including the department of administrative services to the maximum extent permitted by federal rule, regulation or law in a form approved by the department of administrative services; except that in the case of the department of employment security, such form shall be approved jointly by the department of administrative services and the department of employment security. Any dispute arising between any such department or agency and any other state agency as to the utilization requested by the department of administrative services of said facilities, equipment and data shall be resolved by the governor.
Source. 1985, 399:1, eff. July 1, 1985.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.