Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
SCHEDULE 10 Repeals
Section 83
Short title and chapter | Extent of repeal
. . . | . . .
. . . | . . .
The Geneva Conventions Act 1957 (c. 52) | In section 1— (a) in subsection (1) the words from “and on conviction on indictment” to the end; (b) subsections (3) to (5). In section 7(1), the definition of “court”.
. . . | . . .
The Genocide Act 1969 (c. 12) | The whole Act.
The Geneva Conventions (Amendment) Act 1995 (c. 27) | Section 1(4) and (5).
Your change, as a redline
SCHEDULE 10 Repeals
Section 83
Short title and chapter | Extent of repeal
. . . | . . .
. . . | . . .
The Geneva Conventions Act 1957 (c. 52) | In section 1— (a) in subsection (1) the words from “and on conviction on indictment” to the end; (b) subsections (3) to (5). In section 7(1), the definition of “court”.
. . . | . . .
The Genocide Act 1969 (c. 12) | The whole Act.
The Geneva Conventions (Amendment) Act 1995 (c. 27) | Section 1(4) and (5).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.