Propose a change

International Criminal Court Act 2001

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

37 Investigation of proceeds of ICC crime

(1) Where the Secretary of State receives a request from the ICC for assistance— (a) in ascertaining whether a person has benefited from an ICC crime, or (b) in identifying the extent or whereabouts of property derived directly or indirectly from an ICC crime, the Secretary of State may direct a constable to apply for an order or warrant under Schedule 5. (2) In that Schedule— Part 1 makes provision for production or access orders, Part 2 makes provision for the issuing of search warrants, and Part 3 contains supplementary provisions.

Your change, as a redline

37 Investigation of proceeds of ICC crime

(1) Where the Secretary of State receives a request from the ICC for assistance— (a) in ascertaining whether a person has benefited from an ICC crime, or (b) in identifying the extent or whereabouts of property derived directly or indirectly from an ICC crime, the Secretary of State may direct a constable to apply for an order or warrant under Schedule 5. (2) In that Schedule— Part 1 makes provision for production or access orders, Part 2 makes provision for the issuing of search warrants, and Part 3 contains supplementary provisions.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds