Immigration and Asylum Act 1999
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
128 Arrest without warrant.
In the 1971 Act, after section 28, insert— Arrest without warrant. 28A (1) A constable or immigration officer may arrest without warrant a person— (a) who has committed or attempted to commit an offence under section 24 or 24A; or (b) whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting has committed or attempted to commit such an offence. (2) But subsection (1) does not apply in relation to an offence under section 24(1)(d). (3) An immigration officer may arrest without warrant a person— (a) who has committed an offence under section 25(1); or (b) whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting has committed that offence. (4) An immigration officer may arrest without warrant a person— (a) who has committed or attempted to commit an offence under section 25(2); or (b) whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting has committed or attempted to commit that offence. (5) An immigration officer may arrest without warrant a person (“the suspect”) who, or whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting— (a) has committed or attempted to commit an offence under section 26(1)(g); or (b) is committing or attempting to commit that offence. (6) The power conferred by subsection (5) is exercisable only if either the first or the second condition is satisfied. (7) The first condition is that it appears to the officer that service of a summons (or, in Scotland, a copy complaint) is impracticable or inappropriate because— (a) he does not know, and cannot readily discover, the suspect’s name; (b) he has reasonable grounds for doubting whether a name given by the suspect as his name is his real name; (c) the suspect has failed to give him a satisfactory address for service; or (d) he has reasonable grounds for doubting whether an address given by the suspect is a satisfactory address for service. (8) The second condition is that the officer has reasonable grounds for believing that arrest is necessary to prevent the suspect— (a) causing physical injury to himself or another person; (b) suffering physical injury; or (c) causing loss of or damage to property. (9) For the purposes of subsection (7), an address is a satisfactory address for service if it appears to the officer— (a) that the suspect will be at that address for a sufficiently long period for it to be possible to serve him with a summons (or copy complaint); or (b) that some other person specified by the suspect will accept service of a summons (or copy complaint) for the suspect at that address. (10) In relation to the exercise of the powers conferred by subsections (3)(b), (4)(b) and (5), it is immaterial that no offence has been committed. (11) In Scotland the powers conferred by subsections (3), (4) and (5) may also be exercised by a constable.
128 Arrest without warrant.
In the 1971 Act, after section 28, insert— Arrest without warrant. 28A (1) A constable or immigration officer may arrest without warrant a person— (a) who has committed or attempted to commit an offence under section 24 or 24A; or (b) whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting has committed or attempted to commit such an offence. (2) But subsection (1) does not apply in relation to an offence under section 24(1)(d). (3) An immigration officer may arrest without warrant a person— (a) who has committed an offence under section 25(1); or (b) whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting has committed that offence. (4) An immigration officer may arrest without warrant a person— (a) who has committed or attempted to commit an offence under section 25(2); or (b) whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting has committed or attempted to commit that offence. (5) An immigration officer may arrest without warrant a person (“the suspect”) who, or whom he has reasonable grounds for suspecting— (a) has committed or attempted to commit an offence under section 26(1)(g); or (b) is committing or attempting to commit that offence. (6) The power conferred by subsection (5) is exercisable only if either the first or the second condition is satisfied. (7) The first condition is that it appears to the officer that service of a summons (or, in Scotland, a copy complaint) is impracticable or inappropriate because— (a) he does not know, and cannot readily discover, the suspect’s name; (b) he has reasonable grounds for doubting whether a name given by the suspect as his name is his real name; (c) the suspect has failed to give him a satisfactory address for service; or (d) he has reasonable grounds for doubting whether an address given by the suspect is a satisfactory address for service. (8) The second condition is that the officer has reasonable grounds for believing that arrest is necessary to prevent the suspect— (a) causing physical injury to himself or another person; (b) suffering physical injury; or (c) causing loss of or damage to property. (9) For the purposes of subsection (7), an address is a satisfactory address for service if it appears to the officer— (a) that the suspect will be at that address for a sufficiently long period for it to be possible to serve him with a summons (or copy complaint); or (b) that some other person specified by the suspect will accept service of a summons (or copy complaint) for the suspect at that address. (10) In relation to the exercise of the powers conferred by subsections (3)(b), (4)(b) and (5), it is immaterial that no offence has been committed. (11) In Scotland the powers conferred by subsections (3), (4) and (5) may also be exercised by a constable.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.