Policing and Crime Act 2009
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
35 Contents of injunctions
(1) This section applies in relation to an injunction under section 34. (2) The prohibitions included in the injunction may, in particular, have the effect of prohibiting the respondent from— (a) being in a particular place; (b) being with particular persons in a particular place; (c) being in charge of a particular species of animal in a particular place; (d) wearing particular descriptions of articles of clothing in a particular place; (e) using the internet to facilitate or encourage violence or drug-dealing activity. (3) The requirements included in the injunction may, in particular, have the effect of requiring the respondent to— (a) notify the person who applied for the injunction of the respondent's address and of any change to that address; (b) be at a particular place between particular times on particular days; (c) present himself or herself to a particular person at a place where he or she is required to be between particular times on particular days; (d) participate in particular activities between particular times on particular days. (4) A requirement of the kind mentioned in subsection (3)(b) may not be such as to require the respondent to be at a particular place for more than 8 hours in any day. (5) The prohibitions and requirements included in the injunction must, so far as practicable, be such as to avoid— (a) any conflict with the respondent's religious beliefs, and (b) any interference with the times, if any, at which the respondent normally works or attends any educational establishment. (6) Nothing in subsection (2) or (3) affects the generality of section 34(4). (7) In subsection (2) “place” includes an area.
35 Contents of injunctions
(1) This section applies in relation to an injunction under section 34. (2) The prohibitions included in the injunction may, in particular, have the effect of prohibiting the respondent from— (a) being in a particular place; (b) being with particular persons in a particular place; (c) being in charge of a particular species of animal in a particular place; (d) wearing particular descriptions of articles of clothing in a particular place; (e) using the internet to facilitate or encourage violence or drug-dealing activity. (3) The requirements included in the injunction may, in particular, have the effect of requiring the respondent to— (a) notify the person who applied for the injunction of the respondent's address and of any change to that address; (b) be at a particular place between particular times on particular days; (c) present himself or herself to a particular person at a place where he or she is required to be between particular times on particular days; (d) participate in particular activities between particular times on particular days. (4) A requirement of the kind mentioned in subsection (3)(b) may not be such as to require the respondent to be at a particular place for more than 8 hours in any day. (5) The prohibitions and requirements included in the injunction must, so far as practicable, be such as to avoid— (a) any conflict with the respondent's religious beliefs, and (b) any interference with the times, if any, at which the respondent normally works or attends any educational establishment. (6) Nothing in subsection (2) or (3) affects the generality of section 34(4). (7) In subsection (2) “place” includes an area.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.