Policing and Crime Act 2009
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
38 Consultation by applicants for injunctions
(1) Before applying for an injunction under section 37, the applicant must comply with the consultation requirement. (2) The consultation requirement is that the applicant must consult— (a) any local authority, and any chief police officer, that the applicant thinks it appropriate to consult, and (aa) where the respondent is under the age of 18 (and will be under that age when the application is made), the youth offending team established under section 39 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 in whose area it appears to the applicant that the respondent resides, and (b) any other body or individual that the applicant thinks it appropriate to consult. (3) If it appears to the applicant that the respondent resides in the area of two or more youth offending teams, the obligation in subsection (2)(aa) is to consult such of those teams as the applicant thinks appropriate.
38 Consultation by applicants for injunctions
(1) Before applying for an injunction under section 37, the applicant must comply with the consultation requirement. (2) The consultation requirement is that the applicant must consult— (a) any local authority, and any chief police officer, that the applicant thinks it appropriate to consult, and (aa) where the respondent is under the age of 18 (and will be under that age when the application is made), the youth offending team established under section 39 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 in whose area it appears to the applicant that the respondent resides, and (b) any other body or individual that the applicant thinks it appropriate to consult. (3) If it appears to the applicant that the respondent resides in the area of two or more youth offending teams, the obligation in subsection (2)(aa) is to consult such of those teams as the applicant thinks appropriate.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.