The Biodiversity Gain Site Register Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
31 Determination of appeal against rejection of an application
(1) This regulation applies to an appeal under regulation 30(1), (2), (3) or (6) against a decision of the register operator to reject an application. (2) Where, on an appeal to which this regulation applies, the First-tier Tribunal is satisfied that any of the grounds in paragraph (4) applies, it must quash the register operator’s decision to reject the application and— (a) direct the register operator to accept the application, or (b) direct the register operator to reconsider the application under regulation 9, 14, 18 or 25 (as the case may be) in accordance with its ruling. (3) Where, on an appeal to which this regulation applies, the First-tier Tribunal is not satisfied that any of the grounds in paragraph (4) applies, it must confirm the register operator’s decision to reject the application. (4) The grounds referred to in paragraphs (2) and (3) are— (a) that the register operator’s decision to reject the application was based, wholly or partly, on an error of fact; (b) that the register operator’s decision to reject the application was wrong in law; (c) where the decision to reject the application was made under regulation 9(10), 14(10), 18(8) or 25(10), that the register operator’s decision to reject the application was unfair or unreasonable for any other reason; (d) that any decision of the register operator not to exercise its power under regulation 9(6), 14(6), 18(6), or 25(6) (as the case may be), and to reject the application as a result, was unfair or unreasonable for any other reason.
31 Determination of appeal against rejection of an application
(1) This regulation applies to an appeal under regulation 30(1), (2), (3) or (6) against a decision of the register operator to reject an application. (2) Where, on an appeal to which this regulation applies, the First-tier Tribunal is satisfied that any of the grounds in paragraph (4) applies, it must quash the register operator’s decision to reject the application and— (a) direct the register operator to accept the application, or (b) direct the register operator to reconsider the application under regulation 9, 14, 18 or 25 (as the case may be) in accordance with its ruling. (3) Where, on an appeal to which this regulation applies, the First-tier Tribunal is not satisfied that any of the grounds in paragraph (4) applies, it must confirm the register operator’s decision to reject the application. (4) The grounds referred to in paragraphs (2) and (3) are— (a) that the register operator’s decision to reject the application was based, wholly or partly, on an error of fact; (b) that the register operator’s decision to reject the application was wrong in law; (c) where the decision to reject the application was made under regulation 9(10), 14(10), 18(8) or 25(10), that the register operator’s decision to reject the application was unfair or unreasonable for any other reason; (d) that any decision of the register operator not to exercise its power under regulation 9(6), 14(6), 18(6), or 25(6) (as the case may be), and to reject the application as a result, was unfair or unreasonable for any other reason.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.