The Biodiversity Gain Site Register Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
32 Determination of appeal against decision not to make requested amendments
(1) This regulation applies to an appeal under regulation 30(4) against a decision of the register operator not to make an amendment or amendments requested in an application referred to in regulation 17(1) (application to amend an entry in the biodiversity gain site register). (2) Where, on an appeal to which this regulation applies, the First-tier Tribunal is satisfied that either of the grounds in paragraph (4) applies in relation to the register operator’s decision not to make an amendment, it must quash the register operator’s decision not to make the amendment and— (a) direct the register operator to make the amendment, or (b) direct the register operator to reconsider whether to make the amendment. (3) Where, on an appeal to which this regulation applies, the First-tier Tribunal is not satisfied that either of the grounds in paragraph (4) applies in relation to the register operator’s decision not to make an amendment, it must confirm the register operator’s decision not to make the amendment. (4) The grounds referred to in paragraphs (2) and (3) are— (a) that the register operator’s decision was based, wholly or partly, on an error of fact; (b) that the register operator’s decision was wrong in law.
32 Determination of appeal against decision not to make requested amendments
(1) This regulation applies to an appeal under regulation 30(4) against a decision of the register operator not to make an amendment or amendments requested in an application referred to in regulation 17(1) (application to amend an entry in the biodiversity gain site register). (2) Where, on an appeal to which this regulation applies, the First-tier Tribunal is satisfied that either of the grounds in paragraph (4) applies in relation to the register operator’s decision not to make an amendment, it must quash the register operator’s decision not to make the amendment and— (a) direct the register operator to make the amendment, or (b) direct the register operator to reconsider whether to make the amendment. (3) Where, on an appeal to which this regulation applies, the First-tier Tribunal is not satisfied that either of the grounds in paragraph (4) applies in relation to the register operator’s decision not to make an amendment, it must confirm the register operator’s decision not to make the amendment. (4) The grounds referred to in paragraphs (2) and (3) are— (a) that the register operator’s decision was based, wholly or partly, on an error of fact; (b) that the register operator’s decision was wrong in law.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.