Propose a change

The Single Source Contract Regulations 2014

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

7 Contracts that may not be qualifying defence contracts

The contracts specified for the purposes of section 14(2)(c) (contracts that may not be qualifying defence contracts) are contracts— (a) to which the government of any country other than the United Kingdom is party; (b) made within the framework of an international cooperative defence programme , except where the parties to any such contract agree that it is a contract which should be a qualifying defence contract; or (c) made wholly for the purposes of one or more of the following— (i) the acquisition of land (including existing buildings or other structures, and land covered with water), and any estate, interest, easement, servitude or right in or over such land; (ii) the management or maintenance of any land or buildings or other structures; or (iii) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) in relation to which compliance with Part 4, 5 or 6 of the Regulations (records and reports), or section 26 of the Act (duty to report relevant events, circumstances and information), would require disclosure of information which the Secretary of State considers would create a risk to national security; or (e) falling within sub-paragraph (f) below; (f) a contract (B) falls within this sub-paragraph if— (i) B is a contract to which the Secretary of State is a party, (ii) B replaced a contract (A), (iii) the purpose of B is to ensure the performance of contractual obligations which were to be performed under A, (iv) the Secretary of State was a party to A, but it was not a qualifying defence contract, and (v) B is in all material respects (save for the identity of any party to the contract other than the Secretary of State) identical to A.

Your change, as a redline

7 Contracts that may not be qualifying defence contracts

The contracts specified for the purposes of section 14(2)(c) (contracts that may not be qualifying defence contracts) are contracts— (a) to which the government of any country other than the United Kingdom is party; (b) made within the framework of an international cooperative defence programme , except where the parties to any such contract agree that it is a contract which should be a qualifying defence contract; or (c) made wholly for the purposes of one or more of the following— (i) the acquisition of land (including existing buildings or other structures, and land covered with water), and any estate, interest, easement, servitude or right in or over such land; (ii) the management or maintenance of any land or buildings or other structures; or (iii) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) in relation to which compliance with Part 4, 5 or 6 of the Regulations (records and reports), or section 26 of the Act (duty to report relevant events, circumstances and information), would require disclosure of information which the Secretary of State considers would create a risk to national security; or (e) falling within sub-paragraph (f) below; (f) a contract (B) falls within this sub-paragraph if— (i) B is a contract to which the Secretary of State is a party, (ii) B replaced a contract (A), (iii) the purpose of B is to ensure the performance of contractual obligations which were to be performed under A, (iv) the Secretary of State was a party to A, but it was not a qualifying defence contract, and (v) B is in all material respects (save for the identity of any party to the contract other than the Secretary of State) identical to A.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds