Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
174 Planning obligations
(1) TCPA 1990 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 106 (planning obligations)—
(a) after subsection (1) insert—
(1A) In the case of a development consent obligation, the reference to development in subsection (1)(a) includes anything that constitutes development for the purposes of the Planning Act 2008.
;
(b) in subsection (9) after paragraph (a) insert—
(aa) if the obligation is a development consent obligation, contains a statement to that effect;
;
(c) after subsection (13) insert—
(14) In this section and section 106A “development consent obligation” means a planning obligation entered into in connection with an application (or a proposed application) for an order granting development consent.
(3) In section 106A(11) (modification and discharge of planning obligations: meaning of “the appropriate authority”) after paragraph (a) insert—
(aa) the Secretary of State, in the case of any development consent obligation where the application in connection with which the obligation was entered into was (or is to be) decided by the Secretary of State;
(ab) the Infrastructure Planning Commission, in the case of any other development consent obligation;
.
(4) In section 106B(1) (appeals) after “an authority” insert “ (other than the Secretary of State or the Infrastructure Planning Commission) ”.
(5) After section 106B insert—
Legal challenges relating to development consent obligations
106C (1) A court may entertain proceedings for questioning a failure by the Secretary of State or the Infrastructure Planning Commission to give notice as mentioned in section 106A(7) only if—
(a) the proceedings are brought by a claim for judicial review, and
(b) the claim form is filed during the period of 6 weeks beginning with the day on which the period prescribed under section 106A(7) ends.
(2) A court may entertain proceedings for questioning a determination by the Secretary of State or the Infrastructure Planning Commission that a planning obligation shall continue to have effect without modification only if—
(a) the proceedings are brought by a claim for judicial review, and
(b) the claim form is filed during the period of 6 weeks beginning with the day on which notice of the determination is given under section 106A(7).
Your change, as a redline
174 Planning obligations
(1) TCPA 1990 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 106 (planning obligations)—
(a) after subsection (1) insert—
(1A) In the case of a development consent obligation, the reference to development in subsection (1)(a) includes anything that constitutes development for the purposes of the Planning Act 2008.
;
(b) in subsection (9) after paragraph (a) insert—
(aa) if the obligation is a development consent obligation, contains a statement to that effect;
;
(c) after subsection (13) insert—
(14) In this section and section 106A “development consent obligation” means a planning obligation entered into in connection with an application (or a proposed application) for an order granting development consent.
(3) In section 106A(11) (modification and discharge of planning obligations: meaning of “the appropriate authority”) after paragraph (a) insert—
(aa) the Secretary of State, in the case of any development consent obligation where the application in connection with which the obligation was entered into was (or is to be) decided by the Secretary of State;
(ab) the Infrastructure Planning Commission, in the case of any other development consent obligation;
.
(4) In section 106B(1) (appeals) after “an authority” insert “ (other than the Secretary of State or the Infrastructure Planning Commission) ”.
(5) After section 106B insert—
Legal challenges relating to development consent obligations
106C (1) A court may entertain proceedings for questioning a failure by the Secretary of State or the Infrastructure Planning Commission to give notice as mentioned in section 106A(7) only if—
(a) the proceedings are brought by a claim for judicial review, and
(b) the claim form is filed during the period of 6 weeks beginning with the day on which the period prescribed under section 106A(7) ends.
(2) A court may entertain proceedings for questioning a determination by the Secretary of State or the Infrastructure Planning Commission that a planning obligation shall continue to have effect without modification only if—
(a) the proceedings are brought by a claim for judicial review, and
(b) the claim form is filed during the period of 6 weeks beginning with the day on which notice of the determination is given under section 106A(7).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.