Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
(1) This section applies in relation to the examination, under section 212, of a draft charging schedule.
(2) If the examiner considers—
(a) that there is any respect in which the drafting requirements have not been complied with, and
(b) that the non-compliance with the drafting requirements cannot be remedied by the making of modifications to the draft,
the examiner must recommend that the draft be rejected.
(3) Subsection (4) applies if the examiner considers—
(a) that there is any respect in which the drafting requirements have not been complied with, and
(b) that the non-compliance with the drafting requirements could be remedied by the making of modifications to the draft.
(4) The examiner must—
(a) specify the respects in which the drafting requirements have not been complied with,
(b) recommend modifications that the examiner considers sufficient and necessary to remedy that non-compliance, and
(c) recommend that the draft be approved with—
(i) those modifications, or
(ii) other modifications sufficient and necessary to remedy that non-compliance.
(5) Subject to subsections (2) to (4), the examiner must recommend that the draft be approved.
(6) If the examiner makes recommendations under subsection (4), the examiner may recommend other modifications with which the draft should be approved in the event that it is approved.
(7) If the examiner makes recommendations under subsection (5), the examiner may recommend modifications with which the draft should be approved in the event that it is approved.
(8) For exceptions to this section see section 211(11).
(1) This section applies in relation to the examination, under section 212, of a draft charging schedule.
(2) If the examiner considers—
(a) that there is any respect in which the drafting requirements have not been complied with, and
(b) that the non-compliance with the drafting requirements cannot be remedied by the making of modifications to the draft,
the examiner must recommend that the draft be rejected.
(3) Subsection (4) applies if the examiner considers—
(a) that there is any respect in which the drafting requirements have not been complied with, and
(b) that the non-compliance with the drafting requirements could be remedied by the making of modifications to the draft.
(4) The examiner must—
(a) specify the respects in which the drafting requirements have not been complied with,
(b) recommend modifications that the examiner considers sufficient and necessary to remedy that non-compliance, and
(c) recommend that the draft be approved with—
(i) those modifications, or
(ii) other modifications sufficient and necessary to remedy that non-compliance.
(5) Subject to subsections (2) to (4), the examiner must recommend that the draft be approved.
(6) If the examiner makes recommendations under subsection (4), the examiner may recommend other modifications with which the draft should be approved in the event that it is approved.
(7) If the examiner makes recommendations under subsection (5), the examiner may recommend modifications with which the draft should be approved in the event that it is approved.
(8) For exceptions to this section see section 211(11).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.