Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
213 Charging schedule: approval
(1) A charging authority may approve a charging schedule only if—
(a) the examiner makes recommendations under section 212A(4) or (5), and
(b) the charging authority has had regard to those recommendations and the examiner's reasons for them.
(1A) Accordingly, a charging authority may not approve a charging schedule if, under section 212A(2), the examiner recommends rejection.
(1B) If the examiner makes recommendations under section 212A(4), the charging authority may approve the charging schedule only if it does so with modifications that are sufficient and necessary to remedy the non-compliance specified under section 212A(4)(a) (although those modifications need not be the ones recommended under section 212A(4)(b)).
(1C) If a charging authority approves a charging schedule, it may do so with all or none, or some one or more, of the modifications (if any) recommended under section 212A(6) or (7).
(1D) The modifications with which a charging schedule may be approved include only—
(a) modifications required by subsection (1B), and
(b) modifications allowed by subsection (1C).
(2) A charging authority (other than the Mayor of London) must approve a charging schedule—
(a) at a meeting of the authority, and
(b) by a majority of votes of members present.
(3) The Mayor of London must approve a charging schedule personally.
(3A) Subsection (3B) applies if—
(a) the examiner makes recommendations under section 212A(4), and
(b) the charging schedule is approved by the charging authority.
(3B) The charging authority must publish a report setting out how the charging schedule as approved remedies the non-compliance specified under section 212A(4)(a).
(3C) CIL regulations may make provision about the form or contents of a report under subsection (3B).
(4) CIL regulations may make provision for the correction of errors in a charging schedule after approval.
(5) In this section “ examiner ” means examiner under section 212.
(6) For exceptions to this section see section 211(11).
Your change, as a redline
213 Charging schedule: approval
(1) A charging authority may approve a charging schedule only if—
(a) the examiner makes recommendations under section 212A(4) or (5), and
(b) the charging authority has had regard to those recommendations and the examiner's reasons for them.
(1A) Accordingly, a charging authority may not approve a charging schedule if, under section 212A(2), the examiner recommends rejection.
(1B) If the examiner makes recommendations under section 212A(4), the charging authority may approve the charging schedule only if it does so with modifications that are sufficient and necessary to remedy the non-compliance specified under section 212A(4)(a) (although those modifications need not be the ones recommended under section 212A(4)(b)).
(1C) If a charging authority approves a charging schedule, it may do so with all or none, or some one or more, of the modifications (if any) recommended under section 212A(6) or (7).
(1D) The modifications with which a charging schedule may be approved include only—
(a) modifications required by subsection (1B), and
(b) modifications allowed by subsection (1C).
(2) A charging authority (other than the Mayor of London) must approve a charging schedule—
(a) at a meeting of the authority, and
(b) by a majority of votes of members present.
(3) The Mayor of London must approve a charging schedule personally.
(3A) Subsection (3B) applies if—
(a) the examiner makes recommendations under section 212A(4), and
(b) the charging schedule is approved by the charging authority.
(3B) The charging authority must publish a report setting out how the charging schedule as approved remedies the non-compliance specified under section 212A(4)(a).
(3C) CIL regulations may make provision about the form or contents of a report under subsection (3B).
(4) CIL regulations may make provision for the correction of errors in a charging schedule after approval.
(5) In this section “ examiner ” means examiner under section 212.
(6) For exceptions to this section see section 211(11).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.