Propose a change

Planning Act 2008

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

87 Examining authority to control examination of application

(1) It is for the Examining authority to decide how to examine the application. (2) The Examining authority, in making any decision about how the application is to be examined, must— (a) comply with— (i) the following provisions of this Chapter, and (ii) any rules made under section 97, and (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) The Examining authority may in examining the application disregard representations if the Examining authority considers that the representations— (a) are vexatious or frivolous, (b) relate to the merits of policy set out in a national policy statement, or (c) relate to compensation for compulsory acquisition of land or of an interest in or right over land.

Your change, as a redline

87 Examining authority to control examination of application

(1) It is for the Examining authority to decide how to examine the application. (2) The Examining authority, in making any decision about how the application is to be examined, must— (a) comply with— (i) the following provisions of this Chapter, and (ii) any rules made under section 97, and (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) The Examining authority may in examining the application disregard representations if the Examining authority considers that the representations— (a) are vexatious or frivolous, (b) relate to the merits of policy set out in a national policy statement, or (c) relate to compensation for compulsory acquisition of land or of an interest in or right over land.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds