Propose a change

Planning Act 2008

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

95 Hearings: disruption ...

(1) Where an interested party or any other person behaves in a disruptive manner at a hearing, the Examining authority may decide to do any one or more of the following— (a) exclude the person from all, or part, of the remainder of the hearing; (b) allow the person to continue to attend the hearing only if the person complies with conditions specified by the Examining authority; (c) exclude the person from other hearings; (d) direct that the person is allowed to attend other hearings only if the person complies with conditions specified by the Examining authority. (2) In this section “hearing” means— (a) a preliminary meeting under section 88, (b) a hearing under section 91(2), (c) a compulsory acquisition hearing (see section 92), (d) an open-floor hearing (see section 93), (e) any other meeting or hearing that the Examining authority causes to be held for the purposes of the Examining authority's examination of the application, or (f) a site visit. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Your change, as a redline

95 Hearings: disruption ...

(1) Where an interested party or any other person behaves in a disruptive manner at a hearing, the Examining authority may decide to do any one or more of the following— (a) exclude the person from all, or part, of the remainder of the hearing; (b) allow the person to continue to attend the hearing only if the person complies with conditions specified by the Examining authority; (c) exclude the person from other hearings; (d) direct that the person is allowed to attend other hearings only if the person complies with conditions specified by the Examining authority. (2) In this section “hearing” means— (a) a preliminary meeting under section 88, (b) a hearing under section 91(2), (c) a compulsory acquisition hearing (see section 92), (d) an open-floor hearing (see section 93), (e) any other meeting or hearing that the Examining authority causes to be held for the purposes of the Examining authority's examination of the application, or (f) a site visit. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds