The Single Source Contract (Amendment) Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
42 Amendment of regulation 65 (modification of the Regulations)
In regulation 65— (a) for paragraph (3) substitute— (3) Regulations 6, 7 and 8 to 9A do not apply. ; (b) after paragraph (3) insert— (3A) Regulation 7A has effect as if— (a) in paragraph (1)— (i) the words “For the purposes of section 14 of the Act,” were omitted; (ii) for “Secretary of State” there were substituted “contracting authority”; (b) paragraph (4) were omitted; (c) in paragraphs (7)(a) and (8)(a), the references to “competitive process” have the meanings given in regulations 59 and 60. ; (c) omit paragraph (5); (d) after paragraph (9) insert— (9ZA) Regulation 19A (commercial pricing) has effect as if after “Secretary of State”, where it occurs in paragraphs (3)(a)(i) and (4), there were inserted “or the contracting authority”. (9ZB) Regulation 19C (previously agreed price) does not apply. (9ZC) Regulation 19G(5) (aggregation of components) has effect as if for each “Secretary of State” there were substituted “contracting authority”. ; (e) in paragraph (10), for “sub-paragraphs (2)(a)(iii) and (2)(e)” substitute “paragraphs (2)(a)(iii) and (e) and (2A)(a)(ii) and (c)”; (f) in paragraph (11), for “sub-paragraph (2)(e)(ii)” substitute “paragraph (3)(c)(ii)”; (g) in paragraphs (12), for “sub-paragraphs (2)(g) to (i) do” substitute “paragraph (2)(g) to (i) does”; (h) in paragraph (13), for “sub-paragraphs (4)(j) to (l) do” substitute “paragraph (4)(j) to (l) does”; (i) in paragraph (14), for “sub-paragraphs 2(l) to (n) do” substitute “paragraph (2)(l) to (n) does”.
42 Amendment of regulation 65 (modification of the Regulations)
In regulation 65— (a) for paragraph (3) substitute— (3) Regulations 6, 7 and 8 to 9A do not apply. ; (b) after paragraph (3) insert— (3A) Regulation 7A has effect as if— (a) in paragraph (1)— (i) the words “For the purposes of section 14 of the Act,” were omitted; (ii) for “Secretary of State” there were substituted “contracting authority”; (b) paragraph (4) were omitted; (c) in paragraphs (7)(a) and (8)(a), the references to “competitive process” have the meanings given in regulations 59 and 60. ; (c) omit paragraph (5); (d) after paragraph (9) insert— (9ZA) Regulation 19A (commercial pricing) has effect as if after “Secretary of State”, where it occurs in paragraphs (3)(a)(i) and (4), there were inserted “or the contracting authority”. (9ZB) Regulation 19C (previously agreed price) does not apply. (9ZC) Regulation 19G(5) (aggregation of components) has effect as if for each “Secretary of State” there were substituted “contracting authority”. ; (e) in paragraph (10), for “sub-paragraphs (2)(a)(iii) and (2)(e)” substitute “paragraphs (2)(a)(iii) and (e) and (2A)(a)(ii) and (c)”; (f) in paragraph (11), for “sub-paragraph (2)(e)(ii)” substitute “paragraph (3)(c)(ii)”; (g) in paragraphs (12), for “sub-paragraphs (2)(g) to (i) do” substitute “paragraph (2)(g) to (i) does”; (h) in paragraph (13), for “sub-paragraphs (4)(j) to (l) do” substitute “paragraph (4)(j) to (l) does”; (i) in paragraph (14), for “sub-paragraphs 2(l) to (n) do” substitute “paragraph (2)(l) to (n) does”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.