Propose a change

Roads (Scotland) Act 1984

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

134 Extinguishment of rights of statutory undertakers to apparatus etc. in connection with schemes under section 7 and orders under section 9.

(1) . . . section 224 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (extinguishment of certain subsisting rights of statutory undertakers over land required under Part VIII of that Act) shall apply— (a) in relation to land acquired or appropriated by a special road authority for the purpose of carrying out works in pursuance of a scheme under section 7 or an order under section 9 of this Act; and (b) in relation to land forming the site of any part of an existing road which is appropriated or transferred to a special road authority under this Act, as it applies in relation to land acquired under the said Part VIII; and sections 227 to 231 of the said Act of 1997(which contain provisions consequential upon the extinguishment of any right under the said section 224) shall have effect accordingly. (2) The provisions of the said Act of 1997 mentioned in subsection (1) above shall have effect, as applied for the purposes of this section, with the substitution for references therein to the purchasing authority of references to the special road authority. (3) Where apparatus of statutory undertakers supplying electricity, gas, hydraulic power or water is removed in pursuance of a notice or order given or made under the said section 224 (as applied for the purpose of this section), any person who is the owner or occupier of premises to which a supply was given from that apparatus shall be entitled to recover from the special road authority expenditure for the purpose of effecting a connection between the premises and any other apparatus from which a supply is given if that expenditure was reasonably incurred in consequence of the removal.

Your change, as a redline

134 Extinguishment of rights of statutory undertakers to apparatus etc. in connection with schemes under section 7 and orders under section 9.

(1) . . . section 224 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (extinguishment of certain subsisting rights of statutory undertakers over land required under Part VIII of that Act) shall apply— (a) in relation to land acquired or appropriated by a special road authority for the purpose of carrying out works in pursuance of a scheme under section 7 or an order under section 9 of this Act; and (b) in relation to land forming the site of any part of an existing road which is appropriated or transferred to a special road authority under this Act, as it applies in relation to land acquired under the said Part VIII; and sections 227 to 231 of the said Act of 1997(which contain provisions consequential upon the extinguishment of any right under the said section 224) shall have effect accordingly. (2) The provisions of the said Act of 1997 mentioned in subsection (1) above shall have effect, as applied for the purposes of this section, with the substitution for references therein to the purchasing authority of references to the special road authority. (3) Where apparatus of statutory undertakers supplying electricity, gas, hydraulic power or water is removed in pursuance of a notice or order given or made under the said section 224 (as applied for the purpose of this section), any person who is the owner or occupier of premises to which a supply was given from that apparatus shall be entitled to recover from the special road authority expenditure for the purpose of effecting a connection between the premises and any other apparatus from which a supply is given if that expenditure was reasonably incurred in consequence of the removal.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds