Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
13 Power to exclude person from home in cases of violence or risk of harm
(1) A housing injunction may have the effect of excluding the respondent from the place where he or she normally lives (“the premises”) only if— (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) the injunction is granted on the application of— (i) a local authority, (ii) the chief officer of police for the police area that the premises are in, or (iii) if the premises are owned or managed by a housing provider, that housing provider, and (c) the court thinks that— (i) the housing-related anti-social conduct in which the respondent has engaged or threatens to engage consists of or includes the use or threatened use of violence against other persons, or (ii) there is a significant risk of harm to other persons from the respondent. (2) For the purposes of this section a housing provider owns a place if— (a) the housing provider is a person (other than a mortgagee not in possession) entitled to dispose of the fee simple of the place, whether in possession or in reversion, or (b) the housing provider is a person who holds or is entitled to the rents and profits of the place under a lease that (when granted) was for a term of not less then 3 years.
13 Power to exclude person from home in cases of violence or risk of harm
(1) A housing injunction may have the effect of excluding the respondent from the place where he or she normally lives (“the premises”) only if— (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) the injunction is granted on the application of— (i) a local authority, (ii) the chief officer of police for the police area that the premises are in, or (iii) if the premises are owned or managed by a housing provider, that housing provider, and (c) the court thinks that— (i) the housing-related anti-social conduct in which the respondent has engaged or threatens to engage consists of or includes the use or threatened use of violence against other persons, or (ii) there is a significant risk of harm to other persons from the respondent. (2) For the purposes of this section a housing provider owns a place if— (a) the housing provider is a person (other than a mortgagee not in possession) entitled to dispose of the fee simple of the place, whether in possession or in reversion, or (b) the housing provider is a person who holds or is entitled to the rents and profits of the place under a lease that (when granted) was for a term of not less then 3 years.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.