Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
144 Power to take further fingerprints or non-intimate samples
(1) In section 61 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (fingerprinting)—
(a) in subsections (5A) and (5B), for the words after “investigation” in paragraph (b) there is substituted
but
(i) subsection (3A)(a) or (b) above applies, or
(ii) subsection (5C) below applies.
;
(b) after subsection (5B) there is inserted—
(5C) This subsection applies where—
(a) the investigation was discontinued but subsequently resumed, and
(b) before the resumption of the investigation the fingerprints were destroyed pursuant to section 63D(3) below.
(2) In section 63 of that Act (non-intimate samples)—
(a) at the end of subsection (3ZA)(b) there is inserted “, or
(iii) subsection (3AA) below applies.
;
(b) in subsection (3A)(b), for “insufficient; or” there is substituted
insufficient, or
(iii) subsection (3AA) below applies; or
;
(c) after subsection (3A) there is inserted—
(3AA) This subsection applies where the investigation was discontinued but subsequently resumed, and before the resumption of the investigation—
(a) any DNA profile derived from the sample was destroyed pursuant to section 63D(3) below, and
(b) the sample itself was destroyed pursuant to section 63R(4), (5) or (12) below.
Your change, as a redline
144 Power to take further fingerprints or non-intimate samples
(1) In section 61 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (fingerprinting)—
(a) in subsections (5A) and (5B), for the words after “investigation” in paragraph (b) there is substituted
but
(i) subsection (3A)(a) or (b) above applies, or
(ii) subsection (5C) below applies.
;
(b) after subsection (5B) there is inserted—
(5C) This subsection applies where—
(a) the investigation was discontinued but subsequently resumed, and
(b) before the resumption of the investigation the fingerprints were destroyed pursuant to section 63D(3) below.
(2) In section 63 of that Act (non-intimate samples)—
(a) at the end of subsection (3ZA)(b) there is inserted “, or
(iii) subsection (3AA) below applies.
;
(b) in subsection (3A)(b), for “insufficient; or” there is substituted
insufficient, or
(iii) subsection (3AA) below applies; or
;
(c) after subsection (3A) there is inserted—
(3AA) This subsection applies where the investigation was discontinued but subsequently resumed, and before the resumption of the investigation—
(a) any DNA profile derived from the sample was destroyed pursuant to section 63D(3) below, and
(b) the sample itself was destroyed pursuant to section 63R(4), (5) or (12) below.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.