Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
84 Appeals
(1) An appeal against a decision to make or extend a closure order may be made by— (a) a person on whom the closure notice was served under section 79; (b) anyone else who has an interest in the premises but on whom the closure notice was not served. (2) A constable may appeal against— (a) a decision not to make a closure order applied for by a constable; (b) a decision not to extend a closure order made on the application of a constable; (c) a decision (under section 81) not to order the continuation in force of a closure notice issued by a constable. (3) A local authority may appeal against— (a) a decision not to make a closure order applied for by that authority; (b) a decision not to extend a closure order made on the application of that authority; (c) a decision (under section 81) not to order the continuation in force of a closure notice issued by that authority. (3A) An RSH provider may appeal against— (a) a decision not to make a closure order applied for by that provider; (b) a decision not to extend a closure order made on the application of that provider; (c) a decision (under section 81) not to order the continuation in force of a closure notice issued by that provider. (4) An appeal under this section is to the Crown Court. (5) An appeal under this section must be made within the period of 21 days beginning with the date of the decision to which it relates. (6) On an appeal under this section the Crown Court may make whatever order it thinks appropriate. (7) The Crown Court must notify the relevant licensing authority if it makes a closure order in relation to premises in respect of which a premises licence is in force.
84 Appeals
(1) An appeal against a decision to make or extend a closure order may be made by— (a) a person on whom the closure notice was served under section 79; (b) anyone else who has an interest in the premises but on whom the closure notice was not served. (2) A constable may appeal against— (a) a decision not to make a closure order applied for by a constable; (b) a decision not to extend a closure order made on the application of a constable; (c) a decision (under section 81) not to order the continuation in force of a closure notice issued by a constable. (3) A local authority may appeal against— (a) a decision not to make a closure order applied for by that authority; (b) a decision not to extend a closure order made on the application of that authority; (c) a decision (under section 81) not to order the continuation in force of a closure notice issued by that authority. (3A) An RSH provider may appeal against— (a) a decision not to make a closure order applied for by that provider; (b) a decision not to extend a closure order made on the application of that provider; (c) a decision (under section 81) not to order the continuation in force of a closure notice issued by that provider. (4) An appeal under this section is to the Crown Court. (5) An appeal under this section must be made within the period of 21 days beginning with the date of the decision to which it relates. (6) On an appeal under this section the Crown Court may make whatever order it thinks appropriate. (7) The Crown Court must notify the relevant licensing authority if it makes a closure order in relation to premises in respect of which a premises licence is in force.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.