Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
89 Exemption from liability
(1) A police officer, or the chief officer of police under whose direction or control he or she acts, is not liable for damages in proceedings for— (a) judicial review, or (b) the tort of negligence or misfeasance in public office, arising out of anything done or omitted to be done by the police officer in the exercise or purported exercise of a power under this Chapter. (2) A local authority is not liable for damages in proceedings for— (a) judicial review, or (b) the tort of negligence or misfeasance in public office, arising out of anything done or omitted to be done by the authority in the exercise or purported exercise of a power under this Chapter. (2A) An RSH provider is not liable for damages in proceedings for— (a) judicial review, or (b) the tort of negligence, arising out of anything done or omitted to be done by the provider in the exercise or purported exercise of a power under this Chapter. (3) Subsections (1) to (2A) do not apply to an act or omission shown to have been in bad faith. (4) Subsections (1) to (2A) do not apply so as to prevent an award of damages made in respect of an act or omission on the ground that the act or omission was unlawful by virtue of section 6(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998. (5) This section does not affect any other exemption from liability (whether at common law or otherwise).
89 Exemption from liability
(1) A police officer, or the chief officer of police under whose direction or control he or she acts, is not liable for damages in proceedings for— (a) judicial review, or (b) the tort of negligence or misfeasance in public office, arising out of anything done or omitted to be done by the police officer in the exercise or purported exercise of a power under this Chapter. (2) A local authority is not liable for damages in proceedings for— (a) judicial review, or (b) the tort of negligence or misfeasance in public office, arising out of anything done or omitted to be done by the authority in the exercise or purported exercise of a power under this Chapter. (2A) An RSH provider is not liable for damages in proceedings for— (a) judicial review, or (b) the tort of negligence, arising out of anything done or omitted to be done by the provider in the exercise or purported exercise of a power under this Chapter. (3) Subsections (1) to (2A) do not apply to an act or omission shown to have been in bad faith. (4) Subsections (1) to (2A) do not apply so as to prevent an award of damages made in respect of an act or omission on the ground that the act or omission was unlawful by virtue of section 6(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998. (5) This section does not affect any other exemption from liability (whether at common law or otherwise).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.