The Building (Higher-Risk Buildings Procedures) (England) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
49 Appeal in relation to reviewed decisions
(1) A person may appeal to the First-tier Tribunal against the decision of the regulator of a kind referred to in regulation 48(1) (review of regulator’s decisions) provided that the appeal is made within 21 relevant days beginning with the day after the day on which the regulator notifies the person of its decision under regulation 48(5). (2) The First-tier Tribunal may allow an appeal under paragraph (1) only if it is satisfied that the decision appealed against was wrong on one or more of the following grounds— (a) that the decision was based on an error of fact; (b) that the decision was wrong in law; (c) that the decision was unreasonable; (d) that the decision was made without following the procedures set out in the 1984 Act or regulations made under that Act. (3) If the First-tier Tribunal allows an appeal it may quash or vary the decision.
49 Appeal in relation to reviewed decisions
(1) A person may appeal to the First-tier Tribunal against the decision of the regulator of a kind referred to in regulation 48(1) (review of regulator’s decisions) provided that the appeal is made within 21 relevant days beginning with the day after the day on which the regulator notifies the person of its decision under regulation 48(5). (2) The First-tier Tribunal may allow an appeal under paragraph (1) only if it is satisfied that the decision appealed against was wrong on one or more of the following grounds— (a) that the decision was based on an error of fact; (b) that the decision was wrong in law; (c) that the decision was unreasonable; (d) that the decision was made without following the procedures set out in the 1984 Act or regulations made under that Act. (3) If the First-tier Tribunal allows an appeal it may quash or vary the decision.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.