The Building (Higher-Risk Buildings Procedures) (England) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
55 Deemed rejection of the original application
Where, in relation to an application that is prescribed in regulation 50 (section 30A prescribed applications)— (a) the period under regulation 51 (section 30A applications: procedures) for a person to make a section 30A application has expired without the person making a section 30A application in accordance with that regulation, and (b) the regulator did not determine the original application before the expiry of that period, then the original application is treated as rejected by the regulator.
55 Deemed rejection of the original application
Where, in relation to an application that is prescribed in regulation 50 (section 30A prescribed applications)— (a) the period under regulation 51 (section 30A applications: procedures) for a person to make a section 30A application has expired without the person making a section 30A application in accordance with that regulation, and (b) the regulator did not determine the original application before the expiry of that period, then the original application is treated as rejected by the regulator.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.