The Customs (Preferential Trade Arrangements: Error in Evidence of Origin) Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
17 Nature of review
(1) This regulation applies if HMRC must review a decision under regulation 14 or 16. (2) The nature and extent of the review are to be such as HMRC consider appropriate in the circumstances. (3) For the purpose of paragraph (2), HMRC must in particular have regard to steps taken before the beginning of the review— (a) by HMRC in reaching the decision; and (b) by any person in seeking to resolve disagreement about the decision. (4) The review must take into account any representations made by the person or representative to whom the offer of review was made, at a stage which gives HMRC a reasonable opportunity to consider them. (5) The review may conclude that the decision is to be— (a) upheld, (b) varied, or (c) cancelled. (6) HMRC must give the person or representative notice of the conclusions of the review and their reasoning within— (a) the period of 45 days beginning with the relevant date; or (b) such other period as may be agreed between HMRC and the person or representative. (7) In paragraph (6), “relevant date” means— (a) the date on which HMRC received notice from the person or representative accepting the offer of a review (in a case falling within regulation 14); or (b) the date on which HMRC’s obligation to review the decision arose under regulation 16(2) (in a case falling within regulation 16). (8) Where HMRC must review a decision but do not give notice of the conclusions within the period specified in paragraph (6), the review is to be treated as having concluded that the decision is upheld. (9) If paragraph (8) applies, HMRC must give notice to the person or representative of the conclusions which the review is treated as having reached.
17 Nature of review
(1) This regulation applies if HMRC must review a decision under regulation 14 or 16. (2) The nature and extent of the review are to be such as HMRC consider appropriate in the circumstances. (3) For the purpose of paragraph (2), HMRC must in particular have regard to steps taken before the beginning of the review— (a) by HMRC in reaching the decision; and (b) by any person in seeking to resolve disagreement about the decision. (4) The review must take into account any representations made by the person or representative to whom the offer of review was made, at a stage which gives HMRC a reasonable opportunity to consider them. (5) The review may conclude that the decision is to be— (a) upheld, (b) varied, or (c) cancelled. (6) HMRC must give the person or representative notice of the conclusions of the review and their reasoning within— (a) the period of 45 days beginning with the relevant date; or (b) such other period as may be agreed between HMRC and the person or representative. (7) In paragraph (6), “relevant date” means— (a) the date on which HMRC received notice from the person or representative accepting the offer of a review (in a case falling within regulation 14); or (b) the date on which HMRC’s obligation to review the decision arose under regulation 16(2) (in a case falling within regulation 16). (8) Where HMRC must review a decision but do not give notice of the conclusions within the period specified in paragraph (6), the review is to be treated as having concluded that the decision is upheld. (9) If paragraph (8) applies, HMRC must give notice to the person or representative of the conclusions which the review is treated as having reached.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.