Judicial Pensions Act 1981
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
29B Pension credits: restriction on payments
(1) The appropriate Minister shall have no power to accept, for the benefit of a member of a judicial pension scheme constituted under or by virtue of this Act— (a) a payment under paragraph 1(3) of Schedule 5 to the Welfare Reform and Pensions Act 1999, (b) a payment under section 95 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 , or (c) any other payment, to the extent that that payment directly or indirectly represents a pension credit. (2) In this section “the appropriate Minister” means— (a) in relation to any judicial office whose jurisdiction is exercised exclusively in relation to Scotland, the Secretary of State; or (b) subject to paragraph (a), the Lord Chancellor.
29B Pension credits: restriction on payments
(1) The appropriate Minister shall have no power to accept, for the benefit of a member of a judicial pension scheme constituted under or by virtue of this Act— (a) a payment under paragraph 1(3) of Schedule 5 to the Welfare Reform and Pensions Act 1999, (b) a payment under section 95 of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 , or (c) any other payment, to the extent that that payment directly or indirectly represents a pension credit. (2) In this section “the appropriate Minister” means— (a) in relation to any judicial office whose jurisdiction is exercised exclusively in relation to Scotland, the Secretary of State; or (b) subject to paragraph (a), the Lord Chancellor.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.