Land Drainage Act 1991
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Review of boundaries of internal drainage districts.
(1) Subject to subsection (7) below, where— (a) a petition for the alteration of the boundaries of an internal drainage district is made to the appropriate supervisory body by a sufficient number of qualified persons or by a qualified authority; and (b) the boundaries of that district have for a period exceeding ten years been neither reviewed on such a petition nor altered, the appropriate supervisory body shall review those boundaries. (2) Subject to subsection (7) below, where a petition under subsection (1) above is received by the appropriate supervisory body in the circumstances mentioned in subsection (1)(b) above, the appropriate supervisory body shall— (a) inform the relevant Minister; and (b) publish... a notice stating— (i) that the petition has been received; (ii) that a review of the boundaries is being undertaken; and (iii) that representations may be made to the appropriate supervisory body within a period (which shall not be less than thirty days) stated in the notice. (2A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) In carrying out any review required by this section the appropriate supervisory body shall— (a) consult the drainage board for the internal drainage district in question, unless it is itself the drainage board; and (b) consider any representations duly made to it. (4) Within six months after a petition under this section is made or such longer period as the relevant Minister may allow, the appropriate supervisory body shall inform the relevant Minister— (a) whether, as a result of the review, it proposes to submit to him a scheme under section 3 below; and (b) if so, what provision it proposes to make by the scheme. (5) Subject to subsection (6) below, where— (a) the appropriate supervisory body does not propose, as a result of the review, to submit to the relevant Minister a scheme under section 3 below; but (b) it appears to the appropriate supervisory body that an order under section 38 below, or an order varying or revoking such an order, should be made by the drainage board for the internal drainage district in question, the appropriate supervisory body may direct the drainage board to make such an order in such terms as may be specified in the direction. (6) If an internal drainage board to which a direction has been given under subsection (5) above object to the direction, the direction shall have no effect unless it is confirmed (with or without modifications) by the relevant Minister. (7) This section does not require the appropriate supervisory body to carry out a review or publish any notice on a petition which, in the opinion of the relevant Minister, is frivolous.
2 Review of boundaries of internal drainage districts.
(1) Subject to subsection (7) below, where— (a) a petition for the alteration of the boundaries of an internal drainage district is made to the appropriate supervisory body by a sufficient number of qualified persons or by a qualified authority; and (b) the boundaries of that district have for a period exceeding ten years been neither reviewed on such a petition nor altered, the appropriate supervisory body shall review those boundaries. (2) Subject to subsection (7) below, where a petition under subsection (1) above is received by the appropriate supervisory body in the circumstances mentioned in subsection (1)(b) above, the appropriate supervisory body shall— (a) inform the relevant Minister; and (b) publish... a notice stating— (i) that the petition has been received; (ii) that a review of the boundaries is being undertaken; and (iii) that representations may be made to the appropriate supervisory body within a period (which shall not be less than thirty days) stated in the notice. (2A) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) In carrying out any review required by this section the appropriate supervisory body shall— (a) consult the drainage board for the internal drainage district in question, unless it is itself the drainage board; and (b) consider any representations duly made to it. (4) Within six months after a petition under this section is made or such longer period as the relevant Minister may allow, the appropriate supervisory body shall inform the relevant Minister— (a) whether, as a result of the review, it proposes to submit to him a scheme under section 3 below; and (b) if so, what provision it proposes to make by the scheme. (5) Subject to subsection (6) below, where— (a) the appropriate supervisory body does not propose, as a result of the review, to submit to the relevant Minister a scheme under section 3 below; but (b) it appears to the appropriate supervisory body that an order under section 38 below, or an order varying or revoking such an order, should be made by the drainage board for the internal drainage district in question, the appropriate supervisory body may direct the drainage board to make such an order in such terms as may be specified in the direction. (6) If an internal drainage board to which a direction has been given under subsection (5) above object to the direction, the direction shall have no effect unless it is confirmed (with or without modifications) by the relevant Minister. (7) This section does not require the appropriate supervisory body to carry out a review or publish any notice on a petition which, in the opinion of the relevant Minister, is frivolous.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.