Propose a change

Finance Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

206 Admissibility of evidence not affected by offer of settlement etc

(1) In section 105(1) of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (c. 9) (evidence in cases of fraudulent conduct), for paragraphs (a) and (b) and the word “that” preceding them substitute— (a) that where serious tax fraud has been committed the Board may accept a money settlement and that the Board will accept such a settlement, and will not pursue a criminal prosecution, if he makes a full confession of all tax irregularities, or (b) that the extent to which he is helpful and volunteers information is a factor that will be taken into account in determining the amount of any penalty, . (2) For the heading to that section substitute “ Admissibility of evidence not affected by offer of settlement etc ”. (3) In paragraph 3(1) of Schedule 18 to the Finance Act 1999 (c. 16) (which makes corresponding provision in relation to stamp duty), for paragraphs (a) and (b) substitute— (a) that where serious stamp duty fraud has been committed the Board may accept a money settlement and that the Board will accept such a settlement, and will not pursue a criminal prosecution, if he makes a full confession of all stamp duty irregularities, or (b) that the extent to which he is helpful and volunteers information is a factor that will be taken into account in determining the amount of any penalty, . (4) For the heading before that paragraph substitute “ Admissibility of evidence not affected by offer of settlement etc ”. (5) The above amendments have effect in relation to statements made, or documents produced, after the passing of this Act.

Your change, as a redline

206 Admissibility of evidence not affected by offer of settlement etc

(1) In section 105(1) of the Taxes Management Act 1970 (c. 9) (evidence in cases of fraudulent conduct), for paragraphs (a) and (b) and the word “that” preceding them substitute— (a) that where serious tax fraud has been committed the Board may accept a money settlement and that the Board will accept such a settlement, and will not pursue a criminal prosecution, if he makes a full confession of all tax irregularities, or (b) that the extent to which he is helpful and volunteers information is a factor that will be taken into account in determining the amount of any penalty, . (2) For the heading to that section substitute “ Admissibility of evidence not affected by offer of settlement etc ”. (3) In paragraph 3(1) of Schedule 18 to the Finance Act 1999 (c. 16) (which makes corresponding provision in relation to stamp duty), for paragraphs (a) and (b) substitute— (a) that where serious stamp duty fraud has been committed the Board may accept a money settlement and that the Board will accept such a settlement, and will not pursue a criminal prosecution, if he makes a full confession of all stamp duty irregularities, or (b) that the extent to which he is helpful and volunteers information is a factor that will be taken into account in determining the amount of any penalty, . (4) For the heading before that paragraph substitute “ Admissibility of evidence not affected by offer of settlement etc ”. (5) The above amendments have effect in relation to statements made, or documents produced, after the passing of this Act.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds