Propose a change

Finance Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

27 Exceptions from section 26

(1) A person is not liable to a penalty under section 26 if he satisfies— (a) the Commissioners, or (b) on appeal, an appeal tribunal, that there is a reasonable excuse for his conduct. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1) none of the following is a reasonable excuse— (a) an insufficiency of funds available to any person for paying any relevant tax or duty or any penalty due; (b) that reliance was placed by any person on another to perform any task; (c) that the contravention is attributable, in whole or in part, to the conduct of a person on whom reliance to perform any task was so placed. (3) Where, by reason of conduct falling within subsection (1) of section 26 in the case of any relevant tax or duty, a person— (a) is prosecuted for an offence, (b) is given, and has not had withdrawn, a demand notice in respect of a penalty to which he is liable under section 25, or (c) is liable to a penalty imposed upon him under any other provision of the law relating to that relevant tax or duty, that conduct does not also give rise to liability to a penalty under section 26 in respect of that relevant tax or duty. (4) A person is not liable to a penalty under section 26 in respect of any conduct, so far as relating to import VAT, if in respect of that conduct— (a) he is liable to a penalty under any of sections 62 to 69A of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (c. 23) (penalty for contravention of statutory requirements as to VAT), or (b) he would be so liable but for section 62(4), 63(11), 64(6), 67(9), 69(9) or 69A(7) of that Act (conduct resulting in conviction, different penalty etc).

Your change, as a redline

27 Exceptions from section 26

(1) A person is not liable to a penalty under section 26 if he satisfies— (a) the Commissioners, or (b) on appeal, an appeal tribunal, that there is a reasonable excuse for his conduct. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1) none of the following is a reasonable excuse— (a) an insufficiency of funds available to any person for paying any relevant tax or duty or any penalty due; (b) that reliance was placed by any person on another to perform any task; (c) that the contravention is attributable, in whole or in part, to the conduct of a person on whom reliance to perform any task was so placed. (3) Where, by reason of conduct falling within subsection (1) of section 26 in the case of any relevant tax or duty, a person— (a) is prosecuted for an offence, (b) is given, and has not had withdrawn, a demand notice in respect of a penalty to which he is liable under section 25, or (c) is liable to a penalty imposed upon him under any other provision of the law relating to that relevant tax or duty, that conduct does not also give rise to liability to a penalty under section 26 in respect of that relevant tax or duty. (4) A person is not liable to a penalty under section 26 in respect of any conduct, so far as relating to import VAT, if in respect of that conduct— (a) he is liable to a penalty under any of sections 62 to 69A of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (c. 23) (penalty for contravention of statutory requirements as to VAT), or (b) he would be so liable but for section 62(4), 63(11), 64(6), 67(9), 69(9) or 69A(7) of that Act (conduct resulting in conviction, different penalty etc).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds