Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
ANNEX V INFORMATION TO BE CONTAINED IN REPORTS TO IN ARTICLE 10
1. A statement of the preventive action taken pursuant to Article 4. 2. A map showing the following: (a) waters identified in accordance with Article 3 (1) and Annex I indicating for each water which of the criteria in Annex I was used for the purpose of identification; (b) the location of the designed vulnerable zones, distinguishing between existing zones and zones designated since the previous report. 3. A summary of the monitoring results obtained pursuant to Article 6, including a statement of the considerations which led to the designation of each vulnerable zone and to any revision of or addition to designations of vulnerable zones. 4. A summary of the action programmes drawn up pursuant to Article 5 and, in particular: (a) the measures required by Article 5 (4) (a) and (b); (b) the information required by Annex III (4); (c) any additional measures or reinforced actions taken pursuant to Article 5 (5); (d) a summary of the results of the monitoring programmes implemented pursuant to Article 5 (6); (e) the assumptions made by the Member States about the likely timescale within which the waters identified in accordance with Article 3 (1) are expected to respond to the measure in the action programme, along with an indication of the level of uncertainty incorporated in these assumptions.
ANNEX V INFORMATION TO BE CONTAINED IN REPORTS TO IN ARTICLE 10
1. A statement of the preventive action taken pursuant to Article 4. 2. A map showing the following: (a) waters identified in accordance with Article 3 (1) and Annex I indicating for each water which of the criteria in Annex I was used for the purpose of identification; (b) the location of the designed vulnerable zones, distinguishing between existing zones and zones designated since the previous report. 3. A summary of the monitoring results obtained pursuant to Article 6, including a statement of the considerations which led to the designation of each vulnerable zone and to any revision of or addition to designations of vulnerable zones. 4. A summary of the action programmes drawn up pursuant to Article 5 and, in particular: (a) the measures required by Article 5 (4) (a) and (b); (b) the information required by Annex III (4); (c) any additional measures or reinforced actions taken pursuant to Article 5 (5); (d) a summary of the results of the monitoring programmes implemented pursuant to Article 5 (6); (e) the assumptions made by the Member States about the likely timescale within which the waters identified in accordance with Article 3 (1) are expected to respond to the measure in the action programme, along with an indication of the level of uncertainty incorporated in these assumptions.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.