Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
169 Extensions of Pensions Appeal Tribunals Act 1943.
(1) The Pensions Appeal Tribunals Act 1943 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 1 (appeals against rejection of war pension claims made in respect of members of armed forces)—
(a) in subsection (1), after “administered by the Minister” there is inserted “ or under a scheme made under section 1 of the Polish Resettlement Act 1947 ”, and
(b) in subsections (3) and (3A), for “or Order of His Majesty” there is substituted “ , Order of Her Majesty or scheme ”.
(3) In section 7 (application of Act to past decisions and assessments)—
(a) in subsection (2), at the beginning there is inserted “ Subject to subsection (2A) of this section, ”, and
(b) after that subsection, there is inserted—
(2A) Subsection (2) of this section shall not apply in relation to any decision given by the Minister before the passing of this Act which corresponds, apart from any difference of the kind referred to in that subsection, with such a decision as is referred to in section 1 of this Act in respect of claims made under the scheme referred to in that section.
(4) In section 10 (power to modify sections 1 to 4 by Order in Council), in subsections (1) and (2), for “or Order of His Majesty” there is substituted “ , Order of Her Majesty or scheme ”.
(5) In section 12 (interpretation), in the definition of “relevant service”—
(a) for “or Order of His Majesty” there is substituted “ , Order of Her Majesty or scheme ”, and
(b) for “or Order” there is substituted “ , Order or scheme ”.
(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Your change, as a redline
169 Extensions of Pensions Appeal Tribunals Act 1943.
(1) The Pensions Appeal Tribunals Act 1943 is amended as follows.
(2) In section 1 (appeals against rejection of war pension claims made in respect of members of armed forces)—
(a) in subsection (1), after “administered by the Minister” there is inserted “ or under a scheme made under section 1 of the Polish Resettlement Act 1947 ”, and
(b) in subsections (3) and (3A), for “or Order of His Majesty” there is substituted “ , Order of Her Majesty or scheme ”.
(3) In section 7 (application of Act to past decisions and assessments)—
(a) in subsection (2), at the beginning there is inserted “ Subject to subsection (2A) of this section, ”, and
(b) after that subsection, there is inserted—
(2A) Subsection (2) of this section shall not apply in relation to any decision given by the Minister before the passing of this Act which corresponds, apart from any difference of the kind referred to in that subsection, with such a decision as is referred to in section 1 of this Act in respect of claims made under the scheme referred to in that section.
(4) In section 10 (power to modify sections 1 to 4 by Order in Council), in subsections (1) and (2), for “or Order of His Majesty” there is substituted “ , Order of Her Majesty or scheme ”.
(5) In section 12 (interpretation), in the definition of “relevant service”—
(a) for “or Order of His Majesty” there is substituted “ , Order of Her Majesty or scheme ”, and
(b) for “or Order” there is substituted “ , Order or scheme ”.
(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.