Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
94 Sections 91 to 93: supplementary.
(1) Regulations may—
(a) modify sections 91 to 93 in their application to public service pension schemes or to other schemes falling within a prescribed class or description, or
(b) provide that those sections do not apply in relation to schemes falling within a prescribed class or description.
(2) In those sections, “pension” in relation to an occupational pension scheme, includes any benefit under the scheme and any part of a pension and any payment by way of pension.
(3) In the application of sections 91 and 92 to Scotland—
(a) references to a charge are to be read as references to a right in security or a diligence and “charged” is to be interpreted accordingly,
(b) references to assignment are to be read as references to assignation and “assign” is to be interpreted accordingly,
(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(d) the reference to an income payments order under the Insolvency Act 1986 is to be read as a reference to an order under section 90 or 95 of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016, ...
(e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(f) after subsection 91(4) there is inserted—
(4A) Subject to section 73(3)(d) of the Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987, nothing in this section prevents any diligence mentioned in section 46 of that Act being done against a pension under an occupational pension scheme.
Your change, as a redline
94 Sections 91 to 93: supplementary.
(1) Regulations may—
(a) modify sections 91 to 93 in their application to public service pension schemes or to other schemes falling within a prescribed class or description, or
(b) provide that those sections do not apply in relation to schemes falling within a prescribed class or description.
(2) In those sections, “pension” in relation to an occupational pension scheme, includes any benefit under the scheme and any part of a pension and any payment by way of pension.
(3) In the application of sections 91 and 92 to Scotland—
(a) references to a charge are to be read as references to a right in security or a diligence and “charged” is to be interpreted accordingly,
(b) references to assignment are to be read as references to assignation and “assign” is to be interpreted accordingly,
(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(d) the reference to an income payments order under the Insolvency Act 1986 is to be read as a reference to an order under section 90 or 95 of the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016, ...
(e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(f) after subsection 91(4) there is inserted—
(4A) Subject to section 73(3)(d) of the Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987, nothing in this section prevents any diligence mentioned in section 46 of that Act being done against a pension under an occupational pension scheme.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.