Propose a change

Housing Act 1985

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

397 Warrant to authorise entry.

(1) Where it is shown to the satisfaction of a justice of the peace, on sworn information in writing, that admission to premises specified in the information is reasonably required by a person employed by, or acting on the instructions of, the local housing authority— (a) for the purpose of survey and examination to determine whether any powers under this Part should be exercised in respect of the premises, or (b) for the purpose of ascertaining whether an offence has been committed under any of the provisions of this Part listed in section 395(2), the justice may by warrant under his hand authorise that person to enter on the premises for those purposes or for such of those purposes as may be specified in the warrant. (2) The justice shall not grant the warrant unless he is satisfied— (a) that admission to the premises has been refused and, except where the purpose specified in the information is that mentioned in subsection (1)(b), that admission was sought after not less than 24 hours’ notice of the intended entry had been given to the occupier, or (b) that application for admission would defeat the purpose of the entry. (3) The power of entry conferred by the warrant includes power to enter by force, if need be, and may be exercised by the person on whom it is conferred either alone or together with other persons. (4) If the premises are unoccupied or the occupier is temporarily absent, a person entering under the authority of the warrant shall leave the premises as effectively secured against trespassers as he found them. (5) The warrant continues in force until the purpose for which the entry is required is satisfied.

Your change, as a redline

397 Warrant to authorise entry.

(1) Where it is shown to the satisfaction of a justice of the peace, on sworn information in writing, that admission to premises specified in the information is reasonably required by a person employed by, or acting on the instructions of, the local housing authority— (a) for the purpose of survey and examination to determine whether any powers under this Part should be exercised in respect of the premises, or (b) for the purpose of ascertaining whether an offence has been committed under any of the provisions of this Part listed in section 395(2), the justice may by warrant under his hand authorise that person to enter on the premises for those purposes or for such of those purposes as may be specified in the warrant. (2) The justice shall not grant the warrant unless he is satisfied— (a) that admission to the premises has been refused and, except where the purpose specified in the information is that mentioned in subsection (1)(b), that admission was sought after not less than 24 hours’ notice of the intended entry had been given to the occupier, or (b) that application for admission would defeat the purpose of the entry. (3) The power of entry conferred by the warrant includes power to enter by force, if need be, and may be exercised by the person on whom it is conferred either alone or together with other persons. (4) If the premises are unoccupied or the occupier is temporarily absent, a person entering under the authority of the warrant shall leave the premises as effectively secured against trespassers as he found them. (5) The warrant continues in force until the purpose for which the entry is required is satisfied.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds