Propose a change

Housing Act 1985

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

86A Persons qualified to succeed tenant: England

(1) A person (“P”) is qualified to succeed the tenant under a secure tenancy of a dwelling-house in England if— (a) P occupies the dwelling-house as P's only or principal home at the time of the tenant's death, and (b) P is the tenant's spouse or civil partner. (2) A person (“P”) is qualified to succeed the tenant under a secure tenancy of a dwelling-house in England if— (a) at the time of the tenant's death the dwelling-house is not occupied by a spouse or civil partner of the tenant as his or her only or principal home, (b) an express term of the tenancy makes provision for a person other than such a spouse or civil partner of the tenant to succeed to the tenancy, and (c) P's succession is in accordance with that term. (3) Subsection (1) or (2) does not apply if the tenant was a successor as defined in section 88. (4) In such a case, a person (“P”) is qualified to succeed the tenant if— (a) an express term of the tenancy makes provision for a person to succeed a successor to the tenancy, and (b) P's succession is in accordance with that term. (5) For the purposes of this section, a person who was living with the tenant as if they were a married couple or civil partners is to be treated as the tenant’s spouse or civil partner. (6) Subsection (7) applies if, on the death of the tenant, there is by virtue of subsection (5) more than one person who fulfils the condition in subsection (1)(b). (7) Such one of those persons as may be agreed between them or as may, where there is no such agreement, be selected by the landlord is for the purpose of this section to be treated ... as the tenant's spouse or civil partner.

Your change, as a redline

86A Persons qualified to succeed tenant: England

(1) A person (“P”) is qualified to succeed the tenant under a secure tenancy of a dwelling-house in England if— (a) P occupies the dwelling-house as P's only or principal home at the time of the tenant's death, and (b) P is the tenant's spouse or civil partner. (2) A person (“P”) is qualified to succeed the tenant under a secure tenancy of a dwelling-house in England if— (a) at the time of the tenant's death the dwelling-house is not occupied by a spouse or civil partner of the tenant as his or her only or principal home, (b) an express term of the tenancy makes provision for a person other than such a spouse or civil partner of the tenant to succeed to the tenancy, and (c) P's succession is in accordance with that term. (3) Subsection (1) or (2) does not apply if the tenant was a successor as defined in section 88. (4) In such a case, a person (“P”) is qualified to succeed the tenant if— (a) an express term of the tenancy makes provision for a person to succeed a successor to the tenancy, and (b) P's succession is in accordance with that term. (5) For the purposes of this section, a person who was living with the tenant as if they were a married couple or civil partners is to be treated as the tenant’s spouse or civil partner. (6) Subsection (7) applies if, on the death of the tenant, there is by virtue of subsection (5) more than one person who fulfils the condition in subsection (1)(b). (7) Such one of those persons as may be agreed between them or as may, where there is no such agreement, be selected by the landlord is for the purpose of this section to be treated ... as the tenant's spouse or civil partner.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds