Propose a change

Housing Act 1985

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

98 Provisions as to consents required by s. 97.

(1) If a question arises whether the withholding of a consent required by virtue of section 97 (landlord’s consent to improvements) was unreasonable, it is for the landlord to show that it was not. (2) In determining that question the court shall, in particular, have regard to the extent to which the improvement would be likely— (a) to make the dwelling-house, or any other premises, less safe for occupiers, (b) to cause the landlord to incur expenditure which it would be unlikely to incur if the improvement were not made, or (c) to reduce the price which the dwelling-house would fetch if sold on the open market or the rent which the landlord would be able to charge on letting the dwelling-house. (3) A consent required by virtue of section 97 may be validly given notwithstanding that it follows, instead of preceding, the action requiring it. (4) Where a tenant has applied in writing for a consent which is required by virtue of section 97— (a) the landlord shall if it refuses consent give the tenant a written statement of the reason why consent was refused, and (b) if the landlord neither gives nor refuses to give consent within a reasonable time, consent shall be taken to have been withheld.

Your change, as a redline

98 Provisions as to consents required by s. 97.

(1) If a question arises whether the withholding of a consent required by virtue of section 97 (landlord’s consent to improvements) was unreasonable, it is for the landlord to show that it was not. (2) In determining that question the court shall, in particular, have regard to the extent to which the improvement would be likely— (a) to make the dwelling-house, or any other premises, less safe for occupiers, (b) to cause the landlord to incur expenditure which it would be unlikely to incur if the improvement were not made, or (c) to reduce the price which the dwelling-house would fetch if sold on the open market or the rent which the landlord would be able to charge on letting the dwelling-house. (3) A consent required by virtue of section 97 may be validly given notwithstanding that it follows, instead of preceding, the action requiring it. (4) Where a tenant has applied in writing for a consent which is required by virtue of section 97— (a) the landlord shall if it refuses consent give the tenant a written statement of the reason why consent was refused, and (b) if the landlord neither gives nor refuses to give consent within a reasonable time, consent shall be taken to have been withheld.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds