The National Health Service (Procurement, Slavery and Human Trafficking) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
10 Reassessment of risk: contract management for framework agreements and dynamic markets
(1) The public body must regularly re-assess the extent of the modern slavery risk in relation to— (a) any framework agreement the public body has concluded, and (b) any dynamic market the public body has established. (2) In deciding how often to carry out a reassessment under paragraph (1), the public body must have regard to— (a) the subject matter of the framework agreement or dynamic market, (b) the proportionality of such reassessment, taking account of— (i) the market sector concerned, (ii) the extent of the modern slavery risk in that market sector, considering the last risk-assessment, and any other information received subsequently by the public body, (iii) the duration of the framework agreement or dynamic market. (3) The public body must carry out a reassessment as soon as practicable if— (a) there is reason to suspect that the most recent risk assessment is no longer valid, (b) there has been a significant change in the framework agreement or the dynamic market to which the risk assessment relates, or (c) any steps taken in relation to the management of the framework agreement or dynamic market show it to be necessary. (4) When a public body has reassessed the extent of the modern slavery risk under this regulation, the public body must review the action it is taking to ensure that it is taking reasonable steps to address, and where practicable, eliminate any modern slavery risk identified by the assessment.
10 Reassessment of risk: contract management for framework agreements and dynamic markets
(1) The public body must regularly re-assess the extent of the modern slavery risk in relation to— (a) any framework agreement the public body has concluded, and (b) any dynamic market the public body has established. (2) In deciding how often to carry out a reassessment under paragraph (1), the public body must have regard to— (a) the subject matter of the framework agreement or dynamic market, (b) the proportionality of such reassessment, taking account of— (i) the market sector concerned, (ii) the extent of the modern slavery risk in that market sector, considering the last risk-assessment, and any other information received subsequently by the public body, (iii) the duration of the framework agreement or dynamic market. (3) The public body must carry out a reassessment as soon as practicable if— (a) there is reason to suspect that the most recent risk assessment is no longer valid, (b) there has been a significant change in the framework agreement or the dynamic market to which the risk assessment relates, or (c) any steps taken in relation to the management of the framework agreement or dynamic market show it to be necessary. (4) When a public body has reassessed the extent of the modern slavery risk under this regulation, the public body must review the action it is taking to ensure that it is taking reasonable steps to address, and where practicable, eliminate any modern slavery risk identified by the assessment.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.