Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

100 Review of custody by commanding officer

(1) The commanding officer of a person kept in service custody in accordance with section 99 must, subject to subsections (3) and (4), review the keeping of that person in service custody not later than the end of the period for which it is authorised. (2) Subsections (4) and (5) of section 99 apply on each review under this section as they apply where a report is received under section 99(1). (3) A review may be postponed if, having regard to all the circumstances prevailing at the expiry of the last authorisation under section 99(4), it is not practicable to carry out the review at that time. (4) A review may also be postponed if at the expiry of the last authorisation under section 99(4)— (a) the person in service custody is being questioned and the commanding officer is satisfied that an interruption of the questioning for the purpose of carrying out the review would prejudice the investigation in connection with which the person is being questioned; or (b) the commanding officer is not readily available. (5) Subsection (4) does not limit the power to postpone under subsection (3). (6) If a review is postponed under subsection (3) or (4)— (a) it must be carried out as soon as practicable after the expiry of the last authorisation under section 99(4); and (b) the keeping in service custody of the person to whom the review relates is by virtue of this paragraph authorised until that time.

Your change, as a redline

100 Review of custody by commanding officer

(1) The commanding officer of a person kept in service custody in accordance with section 99 must, subject to subsections (3) and (4), review the keeping of that person in service custody not later than the end of the period for which it is authorised. (2) Subsections (4) and (5) of section 99 apply on each review under this section as they apply where a report is received under section 99(1). (3) A review may be postponed if, having regard to all the circumstances prevailing at the expiry of the last authorisation under section 99(4), it is not practicable to carry out the review at that time. (4) A review may also be postponed if at the expiry of the last authorisation under section 99(4)— (a) the person in service custody is being questioned and the commanding officer is satisfied that an interruption of the questioning for the purpose of carrying out the review would prejudice the investigation in connection with which the person is being questioned; or (b) the commanding officer is not readily available. (5) Subsection (4) does not limit the power to postpone under subsection (3). (6) If a review is postponed under subsection (3) or (4)— (a) it must be carried out as soon as practicable after the expiry of the last authorisation under section 99(4); and (b) the keeping in service custody of the person to whom the review relates is by virtue of this paragraph authorised until that time.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds