Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

105 Custody after charge

(1) Where a person (referred to in this section and sections 106 to 109 as “the accused”) is kept in service custody after being charged with a service offence, he must be brought before a judge advocate as soon as practicable. (2) At a hearing under subsection (1), the judge advocate may by order authorise the keeping of the accused in service custody, but only if one or more of conditions A to C in section 106 are met. (3) The period for which a judge advocate may, by an order under subsection (2), authorise the keeping of the accused in service custody is such period, ending not later than eight days after the day on which the order is made, as he considers appropriate having regard to the evidence before him. (4) For the purpose of deciding whether condition A in section 106 is met, the judge advocate must have regard to such of the following considerations as appear to him to be relevant— (a) the nature and seriousness of the offence with which the accused is charged (and the probable method of dealing with him for it), (b) the character, antecedents, associations and social ties of the accused, (c) the accused's behaviour on previous occasions while charged with a service offence and released from service custody or while on bail in criminal proceedings, and (d) the strength of the evidence that the accused committed the offence, as well as to any other considerations which appear to be relevant. (5) If— (a) the accused is charged with an offence under section 42 as respects which the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales is— (i) murder, (ii) manslaughter, (iii) an offence under section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (c. 42) (rape), or (iv) an attempt to commit an offence within sub-paragraph (i) or (iii), (b) representations are made as to any of the matters mentioned in condition A in section 106, and (c) the judge advocate decides not to authorise the keeping of the accused in service custody, the judge advocate must state the reasons for his decision and must cause those reasons to be included in the record of the proceedings. (6) An order under subsection (2) does not authorise the keeping of the accused in service custody— (a) if the accused is subsequently released from service custody, at any time after his release; or (b) at any time after he is sentenced in respect of the offence with which he is charged. (7) Subsection (1) does not apply where the accused is charged with a service offence at a time when he is kept in service custody by reason of a sentence passed in respect of a service offence or of an order under subsection (2), unless that reason ceases to apply.

Your change, as a redline

105 Custody after charge

(1) Where a person (referred to in this section and sections 106 to 109 as “the accused”) is kept in service custody after being charged with a service offence, he must be brought before a judge advocate as soon as practicable. (2) At a hearing under subsection (1), the judge advocate may by order authorise the keeping of the accused in service custody, but only if one or more of conditions A to C in section 106 are met. (3) The period for which a judge advocate may, by an order under subsection (2), authorise the keeping of the accused in service custody is such period, ending not later than eight days after the day on which the order is made, as he considers appropriate having regard to the evidence before him. (4) For the purpose of deciding whether condition A in section 106 is met, the judge advocate must have regard to such of the following considerations as appear to him to be relevant— (a) the nature and seriousness of the offence with which the accused is charged (and the probable method of dealing with him for it), (b) the character, antecedents, associations and social ties of the accused, (c) the accused's behaviour on previous occasions while charged with a service offence and released from service custody or while on bail in criminal proceedings, and (d) the strength of the evidence that the accused committed the offence, as well as to any other considerations which appear to be relevant. (5) If— (a) the accused is charged with an offence under section 42 as respects which the corresponding offence under the law of England and Wales is— (i) murder, (ii) manslaughter, (iii) an offence under section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (c. 42) (rape), or (iv) an attempt to commit an offence within sub-paragraph (i) or (iii), (b) representations are made as to any of the matters mentioned in condition A in section 106, and (c) the judge advocate decides not to authorise the keeping of the accused in service custody, the judge advocate must state the reasons for his decision and must cause those reasons to be included in the record of the proceedings. (6) An order under subsection (2) does not authorise the keeping of the accused in service custody— (a) if the accused is subsequently released from service custody, at any time after his release; or (b) at any time after he is sentenced in respect of the offence with which he is charged. (7) Subsection (1) does not apply where the accused is charged with a service offence at a time when he is kept in service custody by reason of a sentence passed in respect of a service offence or of an order under subsection (2), unless that reason ceases to apply.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds