Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

111 Arrest during proceedings at direction of court

(1) Where— (a) a person has been arraigned before the Court Martial or the Service Civilian Court, and (b) proceedings before the court have not concluded, a judge advocate, if satisfied that taking him into service custody is justified, may direct the arrest of that person. (2) Any person with power to arrest that person for a service offence has the same power, exercisable in the same way, to arrest him pursuant to a direction under subsection (1). (3) Subsections (2) and (3) of section 110 apply for the purposes of this section. (4) A person arrested under this section who is kept in service custody— (a) must as soon as is practicable be brought before a judge advocate for a review of whether he should continue to be kept in service custody; and (b) on that review is to be dealt with as on a review under section 108(1) (see sections 108(4) to (8) and 109).

Your change, as a redline

111 Arrest during proceedings at direction of court

(1) Where— (a) a person has been arraigned before the Court Martial or the Service Civilian Court, and (b) proceedings before the court have not concluded, a judge advocate, if satisfied that taking him into service custody is justified, may direct the arrest of that person. (2) Any person with power to arrest that person for a service offence has the same power, exercisable in the same way, to arrest him pursuant to a direction under subsection (1). (3) Subsections (2) and (3) of section 110 apply for the purposes of this section. (4) A person arrested under this section who is kept in service custody— (a) must as soon as is practicable be brought before a judge advocate for a review of whether he should continue to be kept in service custody; and (b) on that review is to be dealt with as on a review under section 108(1) (see sections 108(4) to (8) and 109).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds