Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

117 Section 116: position where investigation is of multiple offences or offenders

(1) This section applies where the investigation mentioned in section 116(1) relates to two or more incidents (or alleged incidents) or the conduct (or alleged conduct) of two or more persons. (2) Each person's conduct in relation to each incident is to be regarded as giving rise to a separate case. (3) Subsections (4) and (5) apply if— (a) at least one of the cases has been, or must be, referred to the Director of Service Prosecutions (“the Director”) under section 116(2), (b) a service policeman considers that there is sufficient evidence to charge a person with a service offence in another of the cases, (c) that case is not required to be referred to the Director under section 116(2), and (d) the service policeman considers that there is, or may be, a connection between a case falling within paragraph (a) and the case falling within paragraph (c), whether direct or indirect, that makes it appropriate for both cases to be referred to the Director. (4) The service policeman must consult the Director about the existence and nature of the connection between those cases. (5) Following that consultation, if the service policeman considers that there is a connection described in subsection (3)(d), the service policeman must refer the case falling within subsection (3)(c) to the Director. (6) The reference in this section to there being sufficient evidence to charge a person with a service offence is to be read in accordance with section 116(5)(a).

Your change, as a redline

117 Section 116: position where investigation is of multiple offences or offenders

(1) This section applies where the investigation mentioned in section 116(1) relates to two or more incidents (or alleged incidents) or the conduct (or alleged conduct) of two or more persons. (2) Each person's conduct in relation to each incident is to be regarded as giving rise to a separate case. (3) Subsections (4) and (5) apply if— (a) at least one of the cases has been, or must be, referred to the Director of Service Prosecutions (“the Director”) under section 116(2), (b) a service policeman considers that there is sufficient evidence to charge a person with a service offence in another of the cases, (c) that case is not required to be referred to the Director under section 116(2), and (d) the service policeman considers that there is, or may be, a connection between a case falling within paragraph (a) and the case falling within paragraph (c), whether direct or indirect, that makes it appropriate for both cases to be referred to the Director. (4) The service policeman must consult the Director about the existence and nature of the connection between those cases. (5) Following that consultation, if the service policeman considers that there is a connection described in subsection (3)(d), the service policeman must refer the case falling within subsection (3)(c) to the Director. (6) The reference in this section to there being sufficient evidence to charge a person with a service offence is to be read in accordance with section 116(5)(a).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds