Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

135 Reduction in rank: limits on powers

(1) A commanding officer may not award reduction in rank, or disrating, under row 3 of the Table in section 132 unless— (a) he has extended powers for the purposes of this subsection; or (b) the person being punished is a lance corporal or lance bombardier. (2) The reduction in rank or disrating that a commanding officer may award is reduction or disrating— (a) by one acting rank or rate; or (b) if the person being punished has no acting rank or rate, by one substantive rank or rate. (3) Where the person being punished is a corporal in any of Her Majesty's air forces, the reduction in rank authorised by subsection (2)(a) or (b) (as the case may be) is reduction to the highest rank the person has held in that force as an airman; but this is subject to subsection (3A). (3A) In relation to the Royal Air Force Regiment, the reference in subsection (3) to a corporal is to be read as a reference to a lance corporal. (4) The Defence Council may by regulations provide that persons of a trade or branch specified in the regulations may not be reduced or disrated under section 132 below a rank or rate so specified. (5) A commanding officer has extended powers for the purposes of subsection (1) if he has, within the relevant time (defined by section 135A) — (a) applied to higher authority for extended powers for the purposes of that subsection; and (b) been notified by higher authority that his application has been granted. (6) A commanding officer also has extended powers for the purposes of subsection (1) if he is of or above the rank of rear admiral, major-general or air vice-marshal.

Your change, as a redline

135 Reduction in rank: limits on powers

(1) A commanding officer may not award reduction in rank, or disrating, under row 3 of the Table in section 132 unless— (a) he has extended powers for the purposes of this subsection; or (b) the person being punished is a lance corporal or lance bombardier. (2) The reduction in rank or disrating that a commanding officer may award is reduction or disrating— (a) by one acting rank or rate; or (b) if the person being punished has no acting rank or rate, by one substantive rank or rate. (3) Where the person being punished is a corporal in any of Her Majesty's air forces, the reduction in rank authorised by subsection (2)(a) or (b) (as the case may be) is reduction to the highest rank the person has held in that force as an airman; but this is subject to subsection (3A). (3A) In relation to the Royal Air Force Regiment, the reference in subsection (3) to a corporal is to be read as a reference to a lance corporal. (4) The Defence Council may by regulations provide that persons of a trade or branch specified in the regulations may not be reduced or disrated under section 132 below a rank or rate so specified. (5) A commanding officer has extended powers for the purposes of subsection (1) if he has, within the relevant time (defined by section 135A) — (a) applied to higher authority for extended powers for the purposes of that subsection; and (b) been notified by higher authority that his application has been granted. (6) A commanding officer also has extended powers for the purposes of subsection (1) if he is of or above the rank of rear admiral, major-general or air vice-marshal.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds