Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

153 Summary hearings etc rules

(1) The Secretary of State may by rules make provision with respect to— (a) the summary hearing of charges by commanding officers; (b) hearings as regards the making of orders under section 193 (activation of suspended sentence of service detention). (1A) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), the Secretary of State may by rules make provision with respect to the variation or rescission by a commanding officer of— (a) a punishment awarded by the officer, or (b) an order under section 193 made by the officer, in cases where it appears to the officer that the officer had no power to award the punishment or (as the case may be) to make the order. (2) Rules under this section may in particular make provision— (a) as to the practice and procedure to be followed at hearings; (b) as to evidence at hearings; (c) for the delegation by a commanding officer of any of his functions; (d) as to applications for , and grants of, extended powers; (e) as to applications for , and grants of, permission to hear summarily charges of a kind mentioned in section 54; (f) requiring prescribed persons to be notified of prescribed matters. (2A) Rules made under subsection (1A) may make provision about the commencement of punishments or orders varied by the commanding officer. (3) In subsection (2) “prescribed” means prescribed by rules under this section. (a) “prescribed” means prescribed by rules under this section (b) references to hearings include any proceedings for determining whether a punishment, or an order under section 193, should be varied or rescinded.

Your change, as a redline

153 Summary hearings etc rules

(1) The Secretary of State may by rules make provision with respect to— (a) the summary hearing of charges by commanding officers; (b) hearings as regards the making of orders under section 193 (activation of suspended sentence of service detention). (1A) Without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), the Secretary of State may by rules make provision with respect to the variation or rescission by a commanding officer of— (a) a punishment awarded by the officer, or (b) an order under section 193 made by the officer, in cases where it appears to the officer that the officer had no power to award the punishment or (as the case may be) to make the order. (2) Rules under this section may in particular make provision— (a) as to the practice and procedure to be followed at hearings; (b) as to evidence at hearings; (c) for the delegation by a commanding officer of any of his functions; (d) as to applications for , and grants of, extended powers; (e) as to applications for , and grants of, permission to hear summarily charges of a kind mentioned in section 54; (f) requiring prescribed persons to be notified of prescribed matters. (2A) Rules made under subsection (1A) may make provision about the commencement of punishments or orders varied by the commanding officer. (3) In subsection (2) “prescribed” means prescribed by rules under this section. (a) “prescribed” means prescribed by rules under this section (b) references to hearings include any proceedings for determining whether a punishment, or an order under section 193, should be varied or rescinded.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds