Propose a change

Armed Forces Act 2006

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

160 Decisions of Court Martial: finding and sentence

(A1) The finding of the Court Martial on a charge must be determined by votes of the members of the Court Martial other than the judge advocate (the “lay members”) and— (a) where there are three lay members, must be a finding with which no fewer than two of them agree; (b) where there are four lay members, must be a finding with which no fewer than three of them agree; (c) where there are five lay members, must be a finding with which no fewer than four of them agree; (d) where there are six lay members, must be a finding with which no fewer than five of them agree. (1) Subject to subsection (4), any sentence passed by the Court Martial must be determined by a majority of the votes of the members of the court. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) In the case of an equality of votes on the sentence, the judge advocate has a casting vote.

Your change, as a redline

160 Decisions of Court Martial: finding and sentence

(A1) The finding of the Court Martial on a charge must be determined by votes of the members of the Court Martial other than the judge advocate (the “lay members”) and— (a) where there are three lay members, must be a finding with which no fewer than two of them agree; (b) where there are four lay members, must be a finding with which no fewer than three of them agree; (c) where there are five lay members, must be a finding with which no fewer than four of them agree; (d) where there are six lay members, must be a finding with which no fewer than five of them agree. (1) Subject to subsection (4), any sentence passed by the Court Martial must be determined by a majority of the votes of the members of the court. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4) In the case of an equality of votes on the sentence, the judge advocate has a casting vote.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds